Talk:Boston and Skegness (UK Parliament constituency)/GA1
Latest comment: 4 years ago by PinkPanda272 in topic GA Review
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: PinkPanda272 (talk · contribs) 12:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello N Oneemuss. I have read through the page and it looks well written and does not contain any obvious problems. I will start reviewing today, and hope to have it completed in the next 6-7 days. Please bear in mind that it may take a bit longer, as this is my first review. Thanks, PinkPanda272 (talk/contribs) 12:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi N Oneemuss, here is my review:
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Most sources are reliable and well referenced, the only exception being this one [1] from Lincolnshire Pride Magazine, the author's opinions seem to be fairly biased. The page scores 10.7% on the copyvio detector, nothing notable as the only matches are direct quotes.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- I can't see any major content ommisions, summary style used well throughout (bar small problem descibed below).
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- UKIP seems to have far more coverage in the lead section than the Conservatives, even though they have never won the seat. I understand the reasoning (referendum result, high vote shares etc), but I would suggest slimming it down to provide a more balanced view, as the details are already given in a later section. Everything else is portrayed neutrally and without bias.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Article is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All images are freely licensed and well captioned. A picture of Skegness (if available) would be good as a counterpoint to the one of Boston, and an image of either/both of Matt Warman's predecessors would be good in the
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
Member of Parliament section.
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Well written article, references and content are all good. Just a few issues to fix, so I am putting it on hold for a week. Thanks, PinkPanda272 (talk/contribs) 11:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Issues to fix:
- Change or remove Lincolnshire Pride reference
Done
- Condense UKIP coverage in main section
- I've done some condensing. Not sure if it's enough though.
- Looks good, I have condensed slightly more
Done
- Looks good, I have condensed slightly more
- I've done some condensing. Not sure if it's enough though.
- Add Skegness image if possible
- Added. N Oneemuss (talk to me · see my edits · email me) 16:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Nice image, I have edited the caption as there is no context for the Clock Tower
Done
- Nice image, I have edited the caption as there is no context for the Clock Tower
- Added. N Oneemuss (talk to me · see my edits · email me) 16:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Repeat the explanatory note for Buckingham in the lead section
- I removed the part about Buckingham as part of condensing UKIP coverage Username6892 14:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe change 'promoted' for 'moved' in relation to Mark Simmonds' shadow ministerial positions, as he was still a Minister of State when he moved to the Health brief
Done
- Change '...anti-European Union UK Independence Party' to '...Eurosceptic UK Independence Party', makes more sense as that is where the link points to
Done
- Rephrase "...since legally all unprotected constituencies must have electorate size within 5% of the median electorate for unprotected British constituencies" doesn't read very well.
- @PinkPanda272: "..must be within 5% of the median electorate size.." Does that read better?
- Good start, I have condensed it slightly more
Done
- Good start, I have condensed it slightly more
- @PinkPanda272: "..must be within 5% of the median electorate size.." Does that read better?
- The sentence about house prices and wages in the Constituency Profile section is quite long and cumbersome, could do with spitting.
Done
- The graph at the top of the election section states that minor parties that never received more than 5% of the vote are omitted. The Green Party is included, even though they have never met this threshold?
Removed I'd normally allow parties who run 2 elections in a row to be added if they get 2% in at least one, but the Greens didn't in this constituency. Username6892 14:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Good call, looks better now
- I think all of the comments have been addressed now. Thank you for the review! N Oneemuss (talk to me · see my edits · email me) 16:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- @N Oneemuss and Username6892: Interesting and well-written article, all errors have been promptly fixed, well done. I am now more than happy to promote this as a Good Article. I would also suggest nominating it for DYK to give the article more prominence, there are plenty of interesting facts to use. Cheers, PinkPanda272 (talk/contribs) 18:15, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
🔥 Top keywords: Main PageSpecial:SearchPage 3Wikipedia:Featured picturesHouse of the DragonUEFA Euro 2024Bryson DeChambeauJuneteenthInside Out 2Eid al-AdhaCleopatraDeaths in 2024Merrily We Roll Along (musical)Jonathan GroffJude Bellingham.xxx77th Tony AwardsBridgertonGary PlauchéKylian MbappéDaniel RadcliffeUEFA European Championship2024 ICC Men's T20 World CupUnit 731The Boys (TV series)Rory McIlroyN'Golo KantéUEFA Euro 2020YouTubeRomelu LukakuOpinion polling for the 2024 United Kingdom general electionThe Boys season 4Romania national football teamNicola CoughlanStereophonic (play)Gene WilderErin DarkeAntoine GriezmannProject 2025