original research tag
Mhare, it looks like I reverted this edit and this edit just now. The article is indeed described as original scientific research, but it's part of a published journal, hence there's a presumption that journal editors reviewed it before publishing. Internally, that article references the next sentence after the disputed one to an earlier 2009 article by the same author, published in a different publication, and in turn articles from other authors from 1970, 1983, 2000. This makes it likely to be a secondary source. You should probably address any issues with this source separately. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 18:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have no objections. It's on me. Regards. Mhare (talk) 20:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
🔥 Top keywords: Main PageSpecial:SearchPage 3Wikipedia:Featured picturesHouse of the DragonUEFA Euro 2024Bryson DeChambeauJuneteenthInside Out 2Eid al-AdhaCleopatraDeaths in 2024Merrily We Roll Along (musical)Jonathan GroffJude Bellingham.xxx77th Tony AwardsBridgertonGary PlauchéKylian MbappéDaniel RadcliffeUEFA European Championship2024 ICC Men's T20 World CupUnit 731The Boys (TV series)Rory McIlroyN'Golo KantéUEFA Euro 2020YouTubeRomelu LukakuOpinion polling for the 2024 United Kingdom general electionThe Boys season 4Romania national football teamNicola CoughlanStereophonic (play)Gene WilderErin DarkeAntoine GriezmannProject 2025