Talk:Black Hills Institute of Geological Research

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Lmielke359 in topic Comments
WikiProject iconSouth Dakota Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGeology Low‑importance
WikiProject iconTalk:Black Hills Institute of Geological Research is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPalaeontology Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

How many advertisements do you see where the company mentions how the FBI seized illegally obtained property and one of its executives went to prison? Sheep81 00:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I removed the advertisent tag after verifying the article's claims and making references. I determined that the article showed no bias toward the company since it presents only facts without weasel words. Anyone wishing to reinstate the tag should give a justifiable arguement here first. Lmielke359 (talk) 00:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)