Talk:Bellman. Biografin

Latest comment: 2 years ago by AryKun in topic GA Review
WikiProject iconBooks
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bellman. Biografin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 10:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
  • Sorry for the delay in reviewing, was caught up in some irl stuff.
    • No worries!
  • Swedish phrases should be in lang templates.
    • Done.
  • "is the central" → Shouldn't it be "a", or is Bellman truly the most central figure in Swedish songs?
    • He is.
  • The paragraph describing Fredman's Songs could be merged into the one about Fredman's Epistles.
    • Done.
  • "a Dramatis personae" → "dramatis" should be lowercase, I think.
    • Done.
  • Link Bacchanalian.
    • Done.
  • Link Swedish Book Review in the text.
    • Done.
  • "life - for" → Should be a spaced en-dash, perhaps?
    • Done.
  • Spot-checks on '"Review: Bellman. Biografin (Bellman. The Biography)". Swedish Book Review. 2021 (2).' found that it supported the claims made.
    • Noted.
  • Assuming good faith on the rest of the sources, which are in Swedish, but look to be reliable.
    • Noted.
  • Images are all correctly licensed and appropriately used.
    • Noted.
  • Overall a very good article. AryKun (talk) 16:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Passes all criteria now, so will be passing. AryKun (talk) 13:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC)