This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles
This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There is an administrative comment in the /Legal Issues/Legality section after the description of the situation in France, which reads "contradictory". The text is not contradictory, the person inserting the edit comment has simply failed to understand the text. It is quite straightforward: a legal case in France yielded a ruling that the plant was not a chemical extraction and therefore not illegal despite containing an illegal ("scheduled") chemical, as the plant itself was not scheduled. This resulted in the plant being scheduled to plug this loophole, so it's now illegal to possess in France. Simple, clear, not in the least contradictory. Happy now? 2001:56A:F0E9:9B00:F81C:BE5E:1032:DAD7 (talk) 17:03, 2 November 2022 (UTC)JustSomeWikiReader