Talk:Aro-Ibibio Wars

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 152.37.100.122 in topic Article Needs Independent Sources
WikiProject iconIgbo Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Igbo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Igbo related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: African
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
African military history task force

Article Needs Independent Sources

The entire article is unreliable as it lacks any credible references. The only "references" cited lead back to websites appearing to promote the interests of Arochukwu people. This should not be acceptable for WikiProject Nigeria, and certainly, it is not scholarly. At least two independent accounts from credible historians are required for this historical narrative. If this is not available, then I suggest to delete article completely rather than misinform the public. Merlin1935 (talk) 07:53, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

@Merlin: Your observation is accurate. The only literary source is that of Percy Amaury Talbot (Life in Southern Nigeria - 1923) which is an anthropological observational report based on his posting as British Colonial officer in South East Nigeria and not reference on historical records. I am not questioning the source material as it relates to anthropology, myths and culture, but simply noting that most of the references made in the wiki article are not at all referenced in the Talbot's book, the article appears to be wholly made up from conjecture and fantasy. It is not possible that the article author ever read this book. I have! The article in its current form misinforms the reader and have no historical or documented reference base whatsoever. The remaining two references (both same source) are dead links, and as noted in Merlin's note above, have no historical reference either (reviewing internet archive records). 152.37.100.122 (talk) 17:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

RE: Article Needs Independent Sources

Merlin1935,

Independent sources have been added. The article was not misinforming the public. Independent sources on the Aro-Ibibio Wars (until very recently) were extremely hard to find. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LIL T (talkcontribs) 06:56, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aro-Ibibio Wars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:32, 18 October 2016 (UTC)