This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latvia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latvia related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatviaWikipedia:WikiProject LatviaTemplate:WikiProject LatviaLatvia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Olympiad selection controversy
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I removed "Understandably, Krush and Shahade had been expected to be joined by the also highly rated Susan Polgar and Anna Zatonskih to make up a squad capable of winning against the highly favored Chinese Ladies Team. Nevertheless, many would argue that performances are a better indication of strength than Elo rating." because they are opinions of the editor, not encyclopedic facts. As to this sentence "In the aftermath, there was some controversy and considerable media interest when Hahn was not subsequently selected for the Olympiad training squad.", the only "considerable media interest" is the post by chessninja.com, which is a blog, so not a reliable source. Sophia91 (talk) 13:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
