Talk:Alina Plugaru

Latest comment: 12 years ago by OrenBochman in topic The awards section
WikiProject iconPornography Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRomania Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconWomen in Business Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Post-AfD BLP Maintenence

Untitled

To the article creator & editor congratulations on establishing the notability WP:N of this article. WP:N is a significant milestone in reaching a new consensus - but is not a mandate to ignore the other pillars of policy upon which Wikipedia stands. The AfD discussion has revealed controversy regarding the quality of the article's facts and sources and these must now be corrected.

As per the notice above this is article is a biography of a living person WP:BLP. Unsupported conclusions, facts that cannot be verified WP:V, or ones based sources (including, trivial sourcing, deceptive or overtly commercial or determined to contradict the doctrine of No Original research WP:NOR) are subject to challenge and immediate removal from the article -- without prejudice.

  • This good faith maintenance action is carried out in an atomical fashion - to allow easy diff inspection and quick restoration. (But only in problems are remedied).
  • To avoid unneccessary conflict in reaching a new consensus:
    • Do not remove inline or article wide notices until these have been discussed here and an agreement is reached that they have been adequately remedied, as these tags not only coordinate the maintenance but also notify our readers of pottential pitfalls.
    • supply a rebuttal here or in the edit summary indicating the source of the mistakes being addressed - so these can be avoided in future maintenance by expanding our mutual understanding of existing policies.
    • avoid mass reversion of maintenance actions. If these reintroduce mistakes they may be treated as vandalism due to the categorical nature of WP:BLP about removing problematic facts. BO; talk 22:01, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

The awards section

  • This section has been removed since an element '(PIER 2008)' provide an ethnographic trace of an unlinked citations from a previous source - indicating near certainty that this is a copy paste WP:CPVIO
  • Note as explained in the AfD consensus the non WP:N nature Roumanian Awards are not notable - the article had been shown to pass WP:GNG for other reasons. BO; talk 22:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)