This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Does it really make sense to have "Against Heresies" redirect here, instead of the other way around? I suspect that an article linking here would be far more likely to link to the more common title. I suppose it doesn't much matter in the long run. --babbage21:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
The trouble is, there are two early Christian documents called "Against Heresies", so I guess that article has to be a disambig. – Quadell(talk) (random)11:40, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
It is eccentric, IMHO, to title this page "On the Detection and Overthrow of the So-Called Gnosis." The standard title in English is "Against Heresies," or we should use the Latin Aduersus Haereses. Moreover, what is the reasoning behind translating elenchon as "Detection" rather than "Refutation," which is the definition found in LSJ? Chrysologus (talk) 00:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
oratorial campaign
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Now, if an evangelising mission considered to be "orthodox" were to be described as an "oratorial campaign", wouldn't there be a self-righteous cry of— what is that term? oh yes— "POV"! Could a neutral term be found? --Wetman (talk) 10:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm pro-gnostic, but "oratorial campaign" doesn't seem negative to me. It's a bit unwieldy, though, so a better phrase would be welcome. Be my guest. – Quadell(talk) (random)19:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Irenaeus'es theology?
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Do we actually know how much of Irenaeus'es theology that is like the modern christian one? Did he f.ex. accept the concept of aeons? Said: Rursus (☻) 18:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
About the article of course:
1. What was Irenaei title on the book? That requires clarification, because gnosticism is not just any "heresy", it is a group of similar teachings, whether with a common source, as Irenaus claims, or not,
2. There is an issue claiming original research and unverifiable claims, could anyone please pinpoint specific points in the text that makes those statements, preferrably by writing {{fact}} after the sentences?
3. One problem with the article might be that the factual content is not referred to enough before refering to secondary analyses. What is factual content must be evolved better, and what is secondary analyses and theories must be cited better.
Otherwise I don't have knowledge enough to perceive what is plain fact and what is wild speculation in this article. ... said: Rursus (mbork³) 15:26, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Why is Vladimir Lossky in the 'See Also' Section?
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
As far as I know Lossky has not done any work on Adversus haereses, or St. Irenaeus. Lossky was a 20th C. Russian Orthodox theologian.
Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I just did a Google search for Adversus Haereses, and found the article named such. It's basically a stub, and refers to this article. I don't see why they should be two different articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.113.96.85 (talk) 14:24, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
