Talk:Abdulaziz

The correct form should be simply "Abdülaziz", not "Abdülâziz" (Abdülaaziz)

Flavius Belisarius 02:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

There is no need to include an unsourced list of all of this person's descendent's, especially living people. See WP:BLP. I will trim.Anythingyouwant (talk) 01:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Nothing is unsourced....Look here:http://www.ottomanfamily.com/.Dilek2 (talk) 21:43, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

It is also important to consider, is this content notable and reported in independent secondary sources? Off2riorob (talk) 19:47, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Why unsourced?This People still living one...and when the actually Head is passing than the nex from the list are the Heir.Selim78 (talk) 15:09, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Anythingyouwant!!!

If you delete it all, at least the number of children to write properly.

Nesherek had 3 children and none 4

90.134.35.16 (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Böri (talk) 09:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Abdülaziz of the Ottoman Empire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080430051518/http://www.egy.com/P/maps/royaltree.html to http://www.egy.com/P/maps/royaltree.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.4dw.net/royalark/Turkey/turkey11.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:13, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abdülaziz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061025090840/http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/jwh/17.2/isomverhaaren.html to http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/jwh/17.2/isomverhaaren.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Some user with little knowledge of English grammar changed the subsection titled Death. Last I read the section, it was an eloquently written topic shining light into his death and possible assasination with evidence. Now it reeks of bias. Where is everybody? How come nobody stopped this editor? He messed up the section and whitewashed over the original with POV pushing, labelling whatever he did not agree with as Islamist conspiracy theory. Let's keep it neutral and scholarly please. 176.55.86.38 (talk) 17:57, 30 December 2020 (UTC)