This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Referring to people as the "Accused" makes this article sound like a court charge sheet or a report of a court hearing. I have tagged the words as "vague" as a result. At the time that the bombing happened these people were not accused of anything, so they should be identified by the part they played at the time, like the "suspected bomber", or similar. It might help if the article was presented in chronological order, too. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 02:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
