Talk:1951 Polish–Soviet territorial exchange

According to the original maps of the molotov-ribbentrop pact, the main body of sokal belonged to the ussr and the church of the city to the general gouvernement. in this area the border should be the same as from 1945-1951. i am right or is the articel right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.219.14.106 (talk) 14:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC) could we link from here to an article on the 1954 border revisions in the Belarussian Areas?see: http://www.belarusguide.com/statehood/index.html look under poland they can't be as large an area as the person suggests but def worth covering79.69.238.43 (talk) 19:20, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://pl-sci-historia.net.pl/?action=artikel&cat=29&id=63&artlang=pl
  • In 1951 Polish–Soviet territorial exchange on 2011-05-25 03:27:09, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
  • In 1951 Polish–Soviet territorial exchange on 2011-06-04 17:38:08, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.alfa.com.pl/slask/200506/s19.html
  • In 1951 Polish–Soviet territorial exchange on 2011-05-25 03:27:09, 404 Not Found
  • In 1951 Polish–Soviet territorial exchange on 2011-06-04 17:38:19, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Concerning "to the decisive economic benefit of the Soviet Union" and "a stretch of barren land with low quality soil and without any natural resources" - at least Russian Wikipedia refers to the fact that the official initiative was started by the Polish government with the aim to get some oil manufacturing facilities. The actual (albeit unofficial) initiator may, of course, very well have been the USSR, and they may have gotten the better end of the deal (or may not, it is hard to say without reading actual geological reports, etc) but even if imagined, the benefit Poland supposedly got is definitely worthy of mentioning for the sake of balance. --82.131.125.77 (talk) 20:40, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Ah, sorry, somehow I missed the last paragraph in the first reading. Still, it could have been included in the introductive summary. --82.131.125.77 (talk) 20:42, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1951 Polish–Soviet territorial exchange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110519064801/http://untreaty.un.org/unts/1_60000/13/3/00024116.pdf to http://untreaty.un.org/unts/1_60000/13/3/00024116.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)