Talk:1191 papal election

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Vicedomino in topic Some chronological observations
WikiProject iconEuropean Microstates: Vatican City
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Vatican City (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconCatholicism Mid‑importance
WikiProject icon1191 papal election is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconElections and Referendums
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.


Some chronological observations

A bit of independent calculation (research?):

  • The "Annales Ratisponenses" gives the date of XIII Kal. Aprilis (20 March). That is what the writer intended, because he nails it down with reference to a saint's day, St. Benedict on 21 March.
  • The "Continuator of Sigibert's Annals" gives the date of VIII Kal. Aprilis (26 March), which is a simple paleographical mistake: V for X.
  • The "Chron. Magni presb." gives the date III Kal. Apr. (March 30). A copyist forgot to copy the X of "XIII". This is the date that Jaffe, Regesta pontificum Romanorum II (1888), pp. 577-578, likes.
  • Celestine was elected "circa mediam Quadragesimam", according to Ansbert in his "History of the Expedition of Frederick" (ed. J. Dobrowsky, p. 107): "... a Celestino, Iacincto prius dicto, ipse et praefata uxor sua uncxtionem et coronae insigna susceperunt in sequenti die paschae, quod erat VII. Kal. April. Ipse etiam dominus papa, prius diaconus, et circa mediam XLmam recenter electus; sabbato, quo dicitur "Sitientes", sacerdos est factus, et in die paschae hoc est VIII Kalendas Aprilis papa est consecratus, qui statim proxima die ipsum regem et reginam augustali dignitate excellenmter sublimavit." Both Dobrowsky and Jaffe mispunctuate, and ignore the incorrect dates for the coronation of Henry VI and Constance of Sicily, which Ansbert puts on 26 March 1191. When Easter is on 25 March, Ash Wednesday is on 7 February (and the middle of Lent is c. 27 February); Henry VI was still negotiating with the papal legates in the first week of March 1191, and Clement III was still alive. When Easter is on 14 April, Ash Wednesday is on 27 February (and the middle of Lent is c. 20 March). Ansbert's chronology can be set aside.
--Vicedomino (talk) 05:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)