Kishfan

Hello, I'm Jeff G.. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 02:58, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

You are Welcome

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:52, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you so very much Fylindfotberserk.Kishfan (talk) 19:56, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohit Chauhan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghulam Ali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Please see WP:Assume good faith and Wikipedia:Harassment, dont revert good faith edits and threaten/harass other users either. A section has been started on the talk page Talk:Kishore Kumar on the edit and it's reason. If you disagree with the edit come and discuss on the talk page politely otherwise I may have to report it to the admins before it turns into an edit war. 211.27.122.36 (talk) 05:29, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

You have a history of edit war and disruptive editing. Moreover, this ip you are using is suspected sock ip of blocked master sock User:Wolf Cola. So please stop your disruptive editing.Kishfan (talk) 07:50, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tamanna (actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nadaan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tamanna (actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Why did you change my edit in K S Chithra page, yesterday she has won her eight filmfare award. For the god's sake please stop removing my edits. Harshasimha (talk) 03:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Listen Harshasimha, You were previously blocked due to sock puppetry and again you are adding un sourced material that is why I reverted your edits. The material added to Wikipedia must have been published previously by a reliable source. Editors may not add their own views to articles simply because they believe them to be correct. Please also read WP:NOTTRUTH and do not make disruptive edits.-Kishfan (talk) 15:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

The file uploaded by me is in public domain whereas the coloured one is in fair use.Fair use images are only used when there is no other image (in public domain) to illustrate the subject. I hope the coloured file is not deleted by someone on the same pretext.Regards. Vrishchik (talk) 09:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Why is everyone ganging up on me instead of taking a strong stand against vandalism? If you keep supporting vandals against good editors (you can confirm that by looking at my earlier edits), people like me will give up and leave Wikipedia forever, and people will no longer trust Wikipedia as an impartial source of information.

If you have an issue with one or more of my edits, talk to me about it instead of reverting every single change I've made in the past two weeks. I'm a reasonable person when it comes to discussion but not when people revert my change for no reason.

This is *MY* final warning: if WP editors keep treating me this way, I'm going to leave, and you will lose one of your sources of knowledge for Indian music and for physics. RagaBhakta (talk) 18:32, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Listen RagaBhakta, you are engaged in edit war and removing reliable sources from the articles. Please read WP:EDITWAR. You cannot just blatantly revert others' edits because you simply think they are not correct. If you continue like this, you will be facing a block soon. So calm down and remember "you catch more flies with honey than vinegar".-Kishfan (talk) 18:40, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Other people are doing the same thing with my edits (reverting). You can't expect me to sit back and just let people walk all over me. RagaBhakta (talk) 03:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Listen RagaBhakta, you are not doing any good to Wikipedia by blatantly reverting edits of experienced editors including an admin. If you continue like this, you will be blocked soon. Remember editors may not add their own views to articles simply because they believe them to be correct so my best advise is to calm down and read WP:NOTTRUTH.-Kishfan (talk) 08:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Kishfan. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2018-09-01. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 02:51, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

TonyBallioni, thank you.-Kishfan (talk) 05:14, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I observed that RagaBhakta is back at attacking this article using various ips so i have just gotten the page semi-protected indefinitely... hope it saves some of our trouble -- Adamstraw99 (talk) 21:56, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Adamstraw99, semi protection can only stop ip user from disruption but nevertheless you did the right thing. I will look into the edits of this master sock and they will be blocked if they continue with this.-Kishfan (talk) 08:56, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Kishfan. You have new messages at Talk:Atal Bihari Vajpayee.
Message added 15:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DBigXray 15:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi! In reply to your recent revert, see my talk page. Your edit summary doesn't clarify your complete edit. If you only had a problem with YouTube reference per WP:V that you linked, you could have updated another source instead that you think could be better. Does removal of sourced content matter? M. Billoo 14:33, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Billoo! The material added to Wikipedia must have been published previously by a reliable source. Editors may not add their own views to articles simply because they believe them to be correct. Please read WP:NOTTRUTH. Poorly sourced and promotional statements must be removed as per W:POV but if you find some reference for the claim, please re-add the content. Regards.-Kishfan (talk) 22:47, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blood Brother (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Blood Brother (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:26, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Kishfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

There is no named account associated with me and yesterday it was confirmed that the suspected IP is clearly a sock of Wolf Cola as confirmed by a clerk here[1]. Moreover I request to remove sock puppet investigations against my name. @Bbb23: it is also clear now that I have never indulged in sock puppetry so please do not block me on this at least (: Regards Kishfan (talk) 12:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=There is no named account associated with me and yesterday it was confirmed that the suspected IP is clearly a sock of [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wolf Cola|Wolf Cola]] as confirmed by a clerk here[https:https://www.search.com.vn/wiki/index.php?lang=en&q=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Kishfan&diff=prev&oldid=887731957]. Moreover I request to remove sock puppet investigations against my name. <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]]:</span> it is also clear now that I have never indulged in sock puppetry so please do not block me on this at least (: Regards [[User:Kishfan|Kishfan]] ([[User talk:Kishfan#top|talk]]) 12:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=There is no named account associated with me and yesterday it was confirmed that the suspected IP is clearly a sock of [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wolf Cola|Wolf Cola]] as confirmed by a clerk here[https:https://www.search.com.vn/wiki/index.php?lang=en&q=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Kishfan&diff=prev&oldid=887731957]. Moreover I request to remove sock puppet investigations against my name. <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]]:</span> it is also clear now that I have never indulged in sock puppetry so please do not block me on this at least (: Regards [[User:Kishfan|Kishfan]] ([[User talk:Kishfan#top|talk]]) 12:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=There is no named account associated with me and yesterday it was confirmed that the suspected IP is clearly a sock of [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wolf Cola|Wolf Cola]] as confirmed by a clerk here[https:https://www.search.com.vn/wiki/index.php?lang=en&q=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Kishfan&diff=prev&oldid=887731957]. Moreover I request to remove sock puppet investigations against my name. <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]]:</span> it is also clear now that I have never indulged in sock puppetry so please do not block me on this at least (: Regards [[User:Kishfan|Kishfan]] ([[User talk:Kishfan#top|talk]]) 12:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

@Cabayi: I believe you misspoke when you said that "[103.255.6.97] is clearly a sock of Wolf Cola" as it contradicts your earlier finding. If so, please correct the SPI and comment here as well. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Bbb23, 103.255.6.97 (talk · contribs)'s contributions for last July show a revert battle with Kishfan. Linked03 (talk · contribs) (= Unilexis (talk · contribs) ≈ Wolf Cola (talk · contribs)) now reports the IP as a sock of Kishan based on the edit history of Hridaynath Mangeshkar (Kishfan edits, Linked03 reverts, IP reverts, Linked03 reverts and reports Kishfan to SPI). So, either...

• The DHCP fairies have taken an IP that opposed Kishan last July reassigned it to Kishan now; or
• It's a static IP under the control of Wolf Cola that is being used to fabricate a case against Kishfan.

While clerking Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kishfan#9 March I did consider the possibility that Wolf Cola was somehow fabricating a case against Kishfan but, denied any CU confirmation between named user and IP, not wanting to go WP:BEANS, and the advice on the Wolf Cola SPI to go where the evidence led me, decided it was too outlandish to contemplate. It now looks quite credible.

I've amended the current & previous SPIs. Cabayi (talk) 15:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

@Cabayi: You have two seemingly conflicting sets of edits here, once in July 2018 and currently. I'm not sure how you resolve that conflict behaviorally, but your technical comments are not supportable unless Wolf Cola and Kishfan edit from the same location. If you look at the May 6, 2018, report in the Wolf Cola archive, Kishfan alleged that three IPs were being used by Wolf Cola. All three geolocate to Australia. The 103.255. series geolocates to Pakistan.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Cabayi Here is a quote for you by Sigmund Freud, From error to error one discovers the entire truth. This sock master is after me for the last 10 months since I got them blocked every time and they are far more consistent than any one can imagine and I can assure you they will strike again. Bbb23 is quite hesitant to accept my unblock request on their part ): but nevertheless I am hopeful. Last but not the least I am Kishfan and not Kshan (: Regards.- Kishfan (talk) 19:47, 15 March 2019 (UTC)