Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer

• Twinkle1990 (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Created 35 pages with well understating of WP:RS and WP:THREE, none of my created articles have been deleted. 3 months prior I retracted my request due to misunderstanding between WP:PRIMARY and WP:SECONDARY. Now I am experienced enough with WP:SECONDARY and WP:THREE. So I request for the permission to decrease the pendinbg loads on WP:NPP. Regards Twinkle1990 (talk) 14:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC) Twinkle1990 (talk) 14:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Illusion Flame (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · curation log · patrol log · AFD stats · AFC stats · CSD log · PROD log · Draftify log · Mainspace edits · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Hello! A little while ago, I withdrew my NPR request and instead decided to enroll in NPP School. Today, I passed NPP school and my instructor @Atsme: said this in my evaluation:

CONGRATULATIONS on passing this course. You are now eligible to receive the NPP Reviewer rights. You worked well throughout this tutorial, and know what is expected of a good reviewer. I don't think you need a trial period because you adequately demonstrated responsibility and caution, as well as good ole' common sense – the perfect combination. Happy reviewing!! Atsme 💬 📧 17:56, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

You can see me display my knowledge of relevant policies in my NPP school coursework located here. For more information on how I meet the specific requirements, see below:

1. The editor should be a registered Wikipedia user for at least 90 days.

    ~107 days

2. The editor should have 500 undeleted edits to the Wikipedia mainspace that clearly demonstrate proficient knowledge of articles and page quality control.

    +1,300 edits

3. The regular and consistent participation with Wikipedia processes - such as AfD, PROD, CSD (including CSD tagging), and AfC - will be particularly helpful in regards to demonstrating this knowledge.

    CSD tagged over 200 pages and most deleted. Participate in AFDs. I also review drafts with WP:AFC and completed NPP school.

4. The editor should have a solid history that demonstrate proficiency with communicating and interacting with new users, and in a positive, civil, helpful, and appropriate manner.

    Teahouse host, VRT agent, and mentor

5. The editor should have experience with moving pages in accordance with guidelines.

    A little. While I don’t have much experience moving pages, I understand Wikipedias naming conventions and use the movetodraft to somewhat regularly.

6. The editor should have no behavioral blocks or 3RR violations for a span of 6 months prior to applying.

    Clean block log.

7. The editor must review pages solely on a volunteer basis.

    Will do

Thanks for considering! - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 20:04, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot ^talk 20:10, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was withdrawn, not declined. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 20:15, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done until 2023-07-31 — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 22:14, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]