Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive967: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 17:49, 27 October 2017 edit SwisterTwister (talk \| contribs) 187,094 edits OneClickArchiver adding Agressive demands for references ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:25, 28 October 2017 edit undo Bachcell (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 5,330 edits →‎Bachcell's POV editing Next edit →
Line 937: * I find it amusing, and sad, that there is complaining here about Bachcell «completely ignored the fact that the incident is considered a case of mental illness». This, by itself, is proof that this Notice is POV, and POINTy. Look: we have a professor at the University of Queensland saying that Dijon "followed in the wake" of "an Islamic State online fatwa in September."<ref>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/lone-wolves-stray-dogs-and-leaderless-resistance/news-story/51785f897acaefbcbc05d9ad14282e82</ref>. We have the University of Leyden's Terrorism Research Initiative ''Perspectives on Terrorism'' (Vol. 10 N˚2) saying «a series of strange “lone wolf” attacks followed on three consecutive days, the perpetrators declaring “God is Great” in Arabic. Three policemen were stabbed in Joué-lès-Tours, and vehicles were used to run over eleven pedestrians in Dijon».<ref>http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/498/html</ref>. So look, people don't like ''the content'' of Bachcell's highly competent entry, vote for deletion on an AfD that results in no deletion, and then continue advocacy against Bachcell here at the Noticeboard, through other means. Perhaps I should point out I abstained from participating in the AfD from which the unfair accusations against [[User:Bachcell\|Bachcell]] arise. [[User:XavierItzm\|XavierItzm]] ([[User talk:XavierItzm\|talk]]) 06:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC) {{Clear}} == Block Theats From Editors Who Consistently Delete Terrorist Articles == * The Wikipedia community should be concerned that this case of Bachcell's POV editing and E.M. Gregory clearly illustrates that now merely advocating that terrorist attacks and victims should be notable, not a matter of "not news" calling creating articles about terror attacks and opposing AFDs on terrorist attack articles "disruptive" and pointing out and naming editors whose primary contribution to Wikipedia as resource on terrorist attcks is to remove or minimize articles to eliminate one point of view when policy is a NEUTRAL point of view which balances two or more points of view is called "uncivil" can result in calling for topic block and Malik Shabazz is calling for a perma-block. I have avoided editing article contents because of constant threats and harassment. It used to be that disruptive editing of an article justified a block, now merely registering an opposing opinion and pointing out a pattern of disruptive deletions on AFD talk pages has editors calling for threats and blocks. Deletion of topics with wide media coverage does not support both views that incidents may or may not be terrorist in nature. It is remarkable that one editor who only once or twice a month registers a complaint merits this amount of action from TheGracefulSlick, AusLondonder, drmies, when it is the work of deletionists which threatens the quality of the encyclopedia on terrorism and crime topics. It is not a matter of "civility" to point out a pattern of deletion, what is uncivil is to threaten blocks and question RGW, FORUM, COMPETENCE when the matter at hand is to preserve information on terrorist and terrorist-like attacks which is certainly relevant to creation of an encyclopedia which is one of the leading reference works on terrorist attacks. The matter has come to such and extreme that editors are calling for blocks for merely opposing AFD and other deletionist activity on talk pages. E.M.Gregory should be recognized for the hero that he is for tirelessly contributing and defending content of great value to counterterrorist efforts against detractors who make it difficult for researchers to use wikipedia to understand the problem of terrorist and equivalent random mental illness attacks when they can't even find information as basic as the name of the girlfriend of the Las Vegas attacks gunman. [[User:Bachcell\|Bachcell]] ([[User talk:Bachcell\|talk]]) 14:25, 28 October 2017 (UTC) == Disruptive edit for the ethnic group in Malaysia. ==