Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 01:21, 26 June 2019 view source GreenMeansGo (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 63,980 edits →‎Statement by {Non-party} ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:24, 26 June 2019 view source GreenMeansGo (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 63,980 edits →‎Statement by GMG: werds Next edit →
Line 744: === Statement by GMG === I agree with F&K. They should all be deadmined, clearly and unequivocally, and anything less means that ArbCom is, as I have long suspected, a body which can mostly be replaced by the other functionaries in the role of handling private information, as they are on any other project without an ArbCom. Most or all of them will be immediately resysopped in an immediate RfA. I was under the impression that the point of ArbCom was ~~reliance~~resilience and level-headedness regardless of the whims of the mob, and that was supposed to be its saving grace. [[User:GreenMeansGo\|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color:#07CB4B">G</span><span style="color:#449351">M</span><span style="color:#35683d">G</span></span>]][[User talk:GreenMeansGo#top\|<sup style="color:#000;font-family:Impact">talk</sup>]] 01:21, 26 June 2019 (UTC) === Statement by {Non-party} ===