Talk:Snopes/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 01:31, 24 May 2018 edit Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Template editors 2,189,118 edits m Archiving 2 discussion(s) from Talk:Snopes.com) (bot ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:31, 27 August 2018 edit undo Anmccaff (talk \| contribs) 50 edits OneClickArchiver adding "Well-regarded" Next edit →
Line 228: :::::The interested reader may take a look at the timing of the edits, and form his own conclusion about who first came to the talk page. That minor point aside, yes, the source was already in the article, used fairly honestly. It does not support the idea that there is a realistic chance that Snopes is Sorosoral propaganda. You need to find sources that actually support your claim, not hijack ones which do not. [[User:Anmccaff\|Anmccaff]] ([[User talk:Anmccaff\|talk]]) 04:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC) {{Clear}} == "Well-regarded" == Hello, I added the term "well-regarded" to the lead. I found the same story by Melissa Allison of McClatchy in several newspapers, of which I have cited two. Thanks. [[User:BeenAroundAWhile\|BeenAroundAWhile]] ([[User talk:BeenAroundAWhile\|talk]]) 18:25, 9 June 2018 (UTC)