Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 10:40, 9 June 2024 edit AirshipJungleman29 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 33,873 edits →‎User:TheGreatPeng: re ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:41, 9 June 2024 edit undo Daniel (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 73,979 edits →‎User: Jjj1238 persistent vandalism on Maxime Grousset page: follow-up Next edit →
Line 792: ::Given the sister isn't a notable person by Wikipedia's standards, why does this content need to be included? It's fair to assume that the person removing the content is potentally a member of the family. I feel like a decent argument could be made to exclude the content. [[User:Daniel\|Daniel]] ([[User talk:Daniel\|talk]]) 17:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC) :Standard procedure is that it is good to add blue links ([[WP:N\|notable people]]) for relatives to a bio. However, mentioning relatives because we can is bad. What reliable source describes how the sister has influenced the subject of the article, [[Maxime Grousset]]? What reliable source has commented on how the accomplishments of the sister are related to those of the subject? [[User:Johnuniq\|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq\|talk]]) 08:32, 7 June 2024 (UTC) ::Based on no reply in past 48+ hours, I am going to remove the sentence from the article per [[WP:BLPRESTORE]] and start a talk page discussion to establish consensus either way, per [[User:Johnuniq\|Johnuniq]] and my comments above. I'll copy both John and my comments across to start the conversation. Thanks, [[User:Daniel\|Daniel]] ([[User talk:Daniel\|talk]]) 10:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC) == 94.255.152.53 and illegal drugs ==