Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acadia: A New Orleans Bistro: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 16:29, 19 December 2022 edit Another Believer (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 600,518 edits →‎Acadia: A New Orleans Bistro: Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:42, 19 December 2022 edit undo Scope creep (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 137,357 edits reply Tag: Reverted Next edit →
Line 69: *:There's a far cry between "the restaurant industry" and individual restaurants. A "historical narrative" is not quoting listicles that mention a restaurant that only existed a few years. The restaurant industry includes so many tens of thousands of individual local businesses, and I think it's a major issue to treat routine local news blurbs and passing listicle mentions as establishing lasting notability. [[User:Reywas92\|Reywas92]]<sup>[[User talk:Reywas92\|Talk]]</sup> 14:28, 19 December 2022 (UTC) :::Then that's a sourcing bias on your part. My industry shouldn't be largely ignored on Wikipedia simply because restaurants are local (duh). Science articles get to be backed by scientific journals. We don't get that luxury. We get the sources we get, and Wikipedia's food, drink, restaurant culture coverage is fucking abysmal largely because of it. [[User:Ɱ\|<span style="text-shadow:#bbb 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em;" class="texhtml">'''ɱ'''</span>]] [[User talk:Ɱ\|(talk)]] 15:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC) ::::What do you mean your industry? Are you a coi editor? '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus">[[User:scope_creep\|<span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:scope_creep#top\|Talk]]</sup></span>''' 17:42, 19 December 2022 (UTC)