User contributions for TrueHeartSusie3
A user with 6,439 edits. Account created on 2 February 2012.
11 July 2022
- 07:3107:31, 11 July 2022diff hist +649 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →GregKaye on Amber Heard/Heard v. Depp: replyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
9 July 2022
- 14:0114:01, 9 July 2022diff hist +3,129 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →GregKaye on Amber Heard/Heard v. Depp: comment/replyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
27 June 2022
- 11:5911:59, 27 June 2022diff hist −915 Depp v. Heard where exactly is a random journalist being quoted about their pro-Heard views? I can’t find the place in the article. WP articles report things based on sustained coverage, not single views.Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 11:0011:00, 27 June 2022diff hist +1,746 Talk:Depp v. HeardNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 10:2010:20, 27 June 2022diff hist −915 Depp v. Heard →Other reactions: Sorry but exactly why is this random journalist’s view from Sky News AU of all publications relevant? esp since there’s very limited material and quotes on the fact that DV experts / most non-right-wing RS journalists generally find Heard’s account credible - a fact that has been left out from eg Jennifer Freyd’s statements, which just ambiguously refers to DARVO, not mentioning any specifics. It seems that WP editors are not doing a very good job at representing the medi...Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 10:1210:12, 27 June 2022diff hist −476 Depp v. Heard →Court spectators: IB Times is not RS, but an unreliable article farm.Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
18 June 2022
- 07:1907:19, 18 June 2022diff hist +733 Depp v. Heard →Heard's reaction: Bredehoft’s comments about evidence not allowed and the jury are not undue but key parts of her interview. However, I’ve cut the long quote to shorten the section. If you want to shorten the section on EB’s interview, I think the ’absolutelys’ are completely redundant.Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
17 June 2022
- 21:3921:39, 17 June 2022diff hist −17 mTalk:Testimony in Depp v. Heard →Proposal
- 21:3521:35, 17 June 2022diff hist +1,113 Talk:Depp v. Heard →Juror's statement: new section
- 21:2721:27, 17 June 2022diff hist +956 Depp v. Heard Adding Bredehoft's statements re:evidence, UK trial, jury.Tag: Reverted
- 21:1021:10, 17 June 2022diff hist +837 Talk:Depp v. Heard →Inclusion of differences between UK and US trials
- 21:0421:04, 17 June 2022diff hist +555 Talk:Testimony in Depp v. Heard →Proposal: new section
- 20:5720:57, 17 June 2022diff hist −113 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Direct testimony
- 20:4620:46, 17 June 2022diff hist +7 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Direct examination
- 20:4520:45, 17 June 2022diff hist +101 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Expert witnesses for Depp
- 20:4420:44, 17 June 2022diff hist −42 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Witnesses for Depp
- 20:4020:40, 17 June 2022diff hist −61 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Direct examination
- 20:3720:37, 17 June 2022diff hist −43 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Other witnesses
- 20:3420:34, 17 June 2022diff hist −129 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Other witnesses
- 20:3120:31, 17 June 2022diff hist −108 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Depp's rebuttal witnesses
- 20:2720:27, 17 June 2022diff hist −3,101 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Depp's rebuttal witnesses
- 20:0520:05, 17 June 2022diff hist −1 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Other witnesses
- 20:0220:02, 17 June 2022diff hist +771 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Expert witnesses for Heard
- 20:0220:02, 17 June 2022diff hist −1,039 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Other witnesses
- 19:4619:46, 17 June 2022diff hist −1,469 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Expert witnesses for Heard
- 19:3719:37, 17 June 2022diff hist −1,758 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Witness testimony for Heard
- 19:1619:16, 17 June 2022diff hist −46 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Direct testimony
- 19:0719:07, 17 June 2022diff hist −1,025 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Witness testimony for Heard
- 19:0619:06, 17 June 2022diff hist −1,145 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Witness testimony for Heard
- 18:0718:07, 17 June 2022diff hist −21 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Direct examination
- 18:0618:06, 17 June 2022diff hist +1,925 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 →Witness testimony for DeppTag: Disambiguation links added
- 16:1416:14, 17 June 2022diff hist +89,560 User:TrueHeartSusie3/sandbox2 Moving this here; working on a possible solution for incorporating summarized info to main article
15 June 2022
- 18:4418:44, 15 June 2022diff hist +1,405 Amber Heard Rmv unnecessary details and making the descriptions more precise.
- 18:2218:22, 15 June 2022diff hist +29 Amber Heard Very tiny tweaks for clarity
- 18:1518:15, 15 June 2022diff hist −788 Amber Heard Cutting excessive, news-y detail and making slight changes to the order of the sentences about the petition. The 3.5 m signatures claim appeared to have no source backing it, can be added back when a source is provided.
- 17:3617:36, 15 June 2022diff hist +834 Amber Heard Slight tweaks of the description on career, rmv weasel words; adding precise claims from WaPo article; other fixes in the interest of improving the flow and accuracy of the text.
- 17:1217:12, 15 June 2022diff hist +337 Talk:Depp v News Group Newspapers Ltd →Heard's admission to violence against Depp
- 17:0617:06, 15 June 2022diff hist +1,183 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Depp v. Heard
13 June 2022
- 20:2920:29, 13 June 2022diff hist +706 Talk:Depp v. Heard →Coming to an actual consensus for the "Reactions" section
- 20:2520:25, 13 June 2022diff hist +344 User:TrueHeartSusie3No edit summary
- 20:1620:16, 13 June 2022diff hist −1,774 Marilyn Monroe Reverting good faith edit; I'm sorry, but this is minutiae that is mainly of interest to San Luis Obispo and Idyllwild locals, it's not significant enough to warrant coverage in this article.Tag: Undo
- 20:1420:14, 13 June 2022diff hist +660 Talk:Depp v. Heard →Coming to an actual consensus for the "Reactions" section
- 20:0620:06, 13 June 2022diff hist +528 Amber Heard Restoring content mysteriously deleted in the past couple of weeks, despite the fact that there's been no change to the UK ruling.
- 20:0120:01, 13 June 2022diff hist +500 Talk:Depp v News Group Newspapers Ltd →Quote walls
- 19:5919:59, 13 June 2022diff hist +624 Talk:Amber Heard →Attempt to re-insert material removed per consensus
- 19:5119:51, 13 June 2022diff hist +298 Talk:Depp v. Heard →Coming to an actual consensus for the "Reactions" section
- 19:4519:45, 13 June 2022diff hist −5 Talk:Amber Heard Correcting own mistake
- 19:4419:44, 13 June 2022diff hist +524 Amber Heard There you go, the 'missing' source. Again, all media coverage of this is directly linked to Depp's claim. Secondly 'Feb 2020 testimony' appears to be OR; claim footnote also includes plenty of sources that are not RS.
- 19:2619:26, 13 June 2022diff hist +2,006 Talk:Amber Heard →Overemphasis of ACLU pledge
- 13:4413:44, 13 June 2022diff hist −72 Amber Heard Discuss in talk first. The only reason the dates are highlighted is due to Depps claims.Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
🔥 Top keywords: Main PageSpecial:SearchPage 3Wikipedia:Featured picturesHouse of the DragonUEFA Euro 2024Bryson DeChambeauJuneteenthInside Out 2Eid al-AdhaCleopatraDeaths in 2024Merrily We Roll Along (musical)Jonathan GroffJude Bellingham.xxx77th Tony AwardsBridgertonGary PlauchéKylian MbappéDaniel RadcliffeUEFA European Championship2024 ICC Men's T20 World CupUnit 731The Boys (TV series)Rory McIlroyN'Golo KantéUEFA Euro 2020YouTubeRomelu LukakuOpinion polling for the 2024 United Kingdom general electionThe Boys season 4Romania national football teamNicola CoughlanStereophonic (play)Gene WilderErin DarkeAntoine GriezmannProject 2025