User contributions for The-Expose-inator

12 June 2024

• 20:2420:24, 12 June 2024diff hist +1,315‎ Talk:Manuel Noriega‎ →‎Lots of inaccuracies in this: new sectionTag: New topic

26 December 2022

• 20:0720:07, 26 December 2022diff hist +1‎ Tom Cotton‎ →‎Army Ranger controversyTag: Reverted
• 20:0520:05, 26 December 2022diff hist +871‎ mTom Cotton‎ →‎Army Ranger controversy: This is the official US Army answer to the question who can call themselves a "Ranger."Tags: Reverted use of deprecated (unreliable) source

3 February 2022

• 20:0420:04, 3 February 2022diff hist +55‎ mBeau Biden‎ →‎Military service: for accuracy
• 19:4219:42, 3 February 2022diff hist +175‎ User:The-Expose-inator‎No edit summarycurrent
• 19:3619:36, 3 February 2022diff hist +221‎ mJacob's Ladder (1990 film)‎ →‎Plot: Historical inaccuracyTag: Reverted

22 September 2021

• 17:5717:57, 22 September 2021diff hist +11‎ mCarrie Ricci‎ →‎Career
• 17:5517:55, 22 September 2021diff hist +22‎ mCarrie Ricci‎ Corrects mistake and makes consistent with footnote 1 and two that verifies that Ms Ricci retired as a Lieutenant Colonel and not a full Colonel

19 June 2020

• 19:3619:36, 19 June 2020diff hist +12‎ John Bolton‎ →‎Vietnam War
• 19:3119:31, 19 June 2020diff hist −652‎ John Bolton‎ Rremoved misleading information. The 5000 "Reservists" Killed in Vietnam were almost all Regular Army Enlistees and Draftees that attended OCS and were commissioned Reserve Officers on AUS Status. They never served in a Reserve Unit nor were they called to active duty through the Reserves.

30 May 2020

• 16:2916:29, 30 May 2020diff hist +419‎ mH. R. McMaster‎ →‎Military career: Demonstrates how exceptional McMaster was.

7 April 2020

• 16:1516:15, 7 April 2020diff hist +84‎ User:The-Expose-inator‎ updating my bio.
• 16:1016:10, 7 April 2020diff hist +1,480‎ mUser talk:Billmckern‎ →‎Edits

5 April 2020

• 21:0521:05, 5 April 2020diff hist −38‎ mUser talk:Billmckern‎ →‎Edits
• 20:5720:57, 5 April 2020diff hist +1,218‎ User talk:Billmckern‎No edit summary

9 February 2020

• 02:3202:32, 9 February 2020diff hist −6‎ Alexander Vindman‎ →‎Career: Changed "Commanded" to "Led" - In the Army Platoon Leaders do NOT have command authority and are NOT commanders.

17 July 2019

• 18:1618:16, 17 July 2019diff hist +20‎ m2nd Engineer Battalion (United States)‎ Added the official Battalion Motto which is taken verbatim from the Citation of the French Army for extraorinary effort on 18 July 1918 in the Battle of Soissons. I am a former Battalion Commander.

18 February 2019

• 05:5305:53, 18 February 2019diff hist +1‎ mRoger Staubach‎ Corrected a mistake and misinterpretation of the referenced article. "Command" has s specific meaning in the Military and carries UCMJ authority. He supervised 41 men in Vietnam but he was NOT the commander of the unit.
• 05:4705:47, 18 February 2019diff hist −58‎ mRoger Staubach‎ Removed FALSE information. He was NOT the first Naval Academy Graduate commissioned directly into the Supply Corps. I don't know who was but RADM William E. Powell, Jr., the first Black Supply Corps Admiral graduated from the Naval Academy in 1959 and he was directly commissioned into the Supply Corps. Hence, Starbach was definitely NOT the first.

10 June 2018

• 17:0317:03, 10 June 2018diff hist +969‎ User talk:Billmckern‎ →‎US National Security Advisor
• 16:3016:30, 10 June 2018diff hist −9‎ mMichael Boorda‎ Correct inaccuracies in Naval awards policy. Although in the Army the “V” device denotes valor, in the Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard a “V” is officially the “Combat Designation Device” and simply indicates the decoration was awarded for service performed in a combat zone. Hence, even such non-combat awards as the Legion of Merit can be awarded to Navy personnel with a “V” device.

16 October 2017

• 03:5203:52, 16 October 2017diff hist +33‎ James Roosevelt (lawyer)‎No edit summary
• 03:4903:49, 16 October 2017diff hist +6‎ James Roosevelt (lawyer)‎No edit summary
• 03:4803:48, 16 October 2017diff hist −11‎ mJames Roosevelt (lawyer)‎ Minor edit to enter the year he graduated from Law School

2 September 2017

• 05:2305:23, 2 September 2017diff hist +1‎ mH. R. McMaster‎ →‎Military career: Because all serving colonels with one year TIG remain in the zone of consideration until they retire, the term "passed over" is not used in the army for promotion to BG because no one has ever been selected with just one year TIG.
• 05:0405:04, 2 September 2017diff hist +31‎ mWilliam Halsey Jr.‎ →‎Dates of rank: accuracy and read the Wikipedia entry for commodore.

18 June 2017

• 00:5300:53, 18 June 2017diff hist +40‎ Colonel (United States)‎ →‎21st century: Almost ALL Army Senior Service College students are Lieutenant Colonels, NOT colonels!
• 00:4600:46, 18 June 2017diff hist −235‎ Colonel (United States)‎ →‎20th century: Whoever wrote the previous passage had no clue what they were talking about and did not understand AUS vs. RA Officer Promotions.
• 00:3300:33, 18 June 2017diff hist −303‎ mColonel (United States)‎ →‎Insignia: To Correct a BS fable. In 1951, the insignia was redesigned so that the eagle’s head faced the laurel branch on both the left and right shoulder insignia with the arrows to the rear on both insignia.

7 April 2017

• 18:0918:09, 7 April 2017diff hist +10‎ Panama Canal Zone‎ →‎Governance of the Canal Zone: to correct an obvious false statement if you look at the bios of the former governors right here in Wikipedia! As a matter of fact, one governor went on to be the Army Chief of Engineers.

18 March 2017

• 15:5415:54, 18 March 2017diff hist −39‎ mWesley Clark‎ Just to be more accurate. Clark would not have been considered for Brigade Command until after he had graduated from a Senior Service College.

6 March 2017

• 07:1707:17, 6 March 2017diff hist +13‎ User:The-Expose-inator‎No edit summary
• 07:1507:15, 6 March 2017diff hist +522‎ User:The-Expose-inator‎No edit summary
• 07:0207:02, 6 March 2017diff hist +550‎ Talk:H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Swearing in

25 February 2017

• 21:5421:54, 25 February 2017diff hist 0‎ Talk:H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Do we need this much detail on the promotion issue?
• 21:5121:51, 25 February 2017diff hist +744‎ Talk:H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Do we need this much detail on the promotion issue?
• 05:3105:31, 25 February 2017diff hist +584‎ Talk:H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Swearing in
• 05:2205:22, 25 February 2017diff hist +195‎ Talk:H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Do we need this much detail on the promotion issue?
• 05:1605:16, 25 February 2017diff hist +334‎ Talk:H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Promotion List details
• 05:1105:11, 25 February 2017diff hist +546‎ Talk:H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Do we need this much detail on the promotion issue?
• 02:5402:54, 25 February 2017diff hist +537‎ H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Military career
• 02:4602:46, 25 February 2017diff hist +588‎ Talk:H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Promotion List details
• 02:3702:37, 25 February 2017diff hist +2,753‎ Talk:H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Do we need this much detail on the promotion issue?

23 February 2017

• 16:3516:35, 23 February 2017diff hist +16‎ H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Military career
• 16:2716:27, 23 February 2017diff hist +559‎ H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Military career: A review of the statistics released as part of the BG Promotion Board results clearly state that the predominant year group selected by the board was 2002 and a review of the GO Roster shows that Rapp was the Only WP 84 senior to him

22 February 2017

• 05:3505:35, 22 February 2017diff hist +19‎ H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Military Career
• 05:1505:15, 22 February 2017diff hist +598‎ H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Military Career

20 February 2017

• 06:0606:06, 20 February 2017diff hist +91‎ H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Promotion controversy and career as a general officer
• 06:0206:02, 20 February 2017diff hist +38‎ H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Promotion controversy and career as a general officer
• 05:5805:58, 20 February 2017diff hist +362‎ H. R. McMaster‎ →‎Promotion controversy and career as a general officer