03:0603:06, 16 January 2011diffhist+4,225 CounterPunch Actually, his position is clear: criticisms of CounterPunch should be included on its Wikipedia page. And the fact that 2 people are against means there's no consensus
02:5402:54, 16 January 2011diffhist−74 CounterPunch Also, you're contributions to the talkpage have been so minimal as to be insignificant, so your readings of the article is irrelevant
02:5102:51, 16 January 2011diffhist+4,299 CounterPunch WP:BURDEN deals with the issue of the reliability of the sources which has been established for all the sources.
02:3502:35, 16 January 2011diffhist+4,299 CounterPunch You're right this is an encyclopedia...which is why criticisms (as well as it's praise) for the magazine shouldn't be censored