22:4322:43, 1 February 2020diffhist−367 Rachael Leigh Cook Please discuss on talk page (or preferably on the talk page of the film). I disagree with the claim that it was a sleeper hit but ''more importantly'' it seems unnecessary and WP:UNDUE to highlight it is this article, even if we could agree that it was an unexpected hit or some other more appropriate wording.Tag: references removed
21:5821:58, 1 February 2020diffhist−18 Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse Reading the source again it does not seem appropriate to say "invent" or to claim that there was a named style called "misprint style" when it was a computer based reinterpretation of a real world printing artifact.
20:5320:53, 1 February 2020diffhist−234 Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse Do you even grammar? Yet again you added "Editorial APM Adam Brown" but that sentence barely makes sense, is without sources and also conflicts with RELIABLE SOURCES. We went through this before about JJJ, and out of an abundance of caution removed it. You don't get to force this through, you need to at least reopen discussion first, and provide RELIABLE SOURCES.