Mormonism and Nicene Christianity

While historians recognize the roots of Mormonism in American Protestantism and the Second Great Awakening of the 1820s and 1830s,^[3][17] Mormonism has also been identified as "a radical departure from traditional"—i.e. mainline—"Protestant Christianity"^[18] and a "profoundly primitivist tradition."^[12] Nevertheless, Mormonism falls within the scope of the Evangelical Protestantism of the Second Great Awakening in the United States (1800–1840).^{[3][4][5][19]} The conception of God in early Mormonism was very similar to the conception of the Christian God held within Protestant Christianity, although early Mormons had already begun developing their own distinct doctrine.^[13]

Mormonism arose in the 1820s during a period of radical reform and experimentation within American Protestantism and Mormonism is integrally connected to that religious environment.^{[3][12][20][21]} As a form of Christian primitivism, the new faith was one among several contemporary religious movements that claimed to restore Christianity to its condition at the time of the Twelve Apostles.^[12][22]

The Book of Mormon (1830), which codifies the earliest Mormon doctrine, was intended, in part, to settle ongoing doctrinal disputes among contemporary Christian denominations^[23] and to create a single shared theology.^[24] Joseph Smith believed in the Bible^[25] and shared the Protestant tradition that the Bible (excluding the Apocrypha) was originally revealed by God to humanity^[26] and had contained the "fulness of the gospel.” Nevertheless, Smith believed the Bible of his era had degenerated from its original form. Smith blamed the Catholic Church for the loss of biblical books and for introducing corruptions and obfuscations in the biblical text.^[27] Smith said that the Book of Mormon revealed "plain and precious things that had been taken away" from the Bible.^[28] Smith also completed an unpublished revision of the Bible in 1833,^[29] which he said corrected many of these errors,^[30] and added inspired commentary.^[31] Smith endowed the Book of Mormon with status equal to the Bible.^[32]

The faith's earliest theology, as reflected in the Book of Mormon and contemporaneous writings by Joseph Smith, was an unsophisticated version of Trinitarianism or Monarchianism.^[33] But according to Kurt Widmer, "early Mormons were reacting against a heavily intellectualized and theologized Trinitarian concept of God" and the nature of God was not at first of central importance to Smith.^[34]

In 1834, Smith and his associate Sidney Rigdon developed a series of Lectures on Faith that they incorporated into the faith's Doctrine and Covenants (1835). These lectures described "two personages" in the heavens: the Father, "a personage of spirit, glory, and power," and the Son, "a personage of tabernacle" who "received the fulness of the glory of the Father—possessing the same mind with the Father, which mind is the Holy Spirit."^[35] This has sometimes been described as a form of Binitarianism.^[36]

Early Mormon soteriology, although not following a preexisting tradition, was generally Arminian in tendency.^[37] Early Mormonism agreed with Methodists and the Disciples of Christ in rejecting Calvinistic doctrines in favor of Christian perfection and free will (called free agency).^[38] Also, while the Book of Mormon affirmed the doctrine of original sin,^[39] it also agrees with other Arminian denominations that children are incapable of sin and in a state of grace.^[40][41]

Like other Christian primitivists, Smith located the authority of Christianity in correct interpretation of the Bible^[42]—although he also maintained (as did the Shakers) that interpretation of the Bible should be guided by new and continuing revelation.^[43] Initially, the authority of Smith's faith was based on correct doctrine^[44] and his own claim of prophethood.^[45] Then during the early 1830s, Smith added to this authority apostolic succession, represented by angelic apostles and prophets who Smith said had ordained him.^[46]

From the mid-1830s to his death in 1844, Smith continued to introduce ideas and practices which differed significantly from traditional Protestantism. First, Smith pressed Christian perfection beyond Protestant orthodoxy.^[47] He followed non-Protestant Christians in rejecting the doctrine of justification by faith alone^[48] and moved toward universalism by introducing a hierarchy of three glorious heavens, in which even the wicked had a place.^[49] In the late 1830s, Smith introduced baptism for the dead by proxy as a means for unredeemed souls to accept salvation in the afterlife,^[50] and he also taught that the ordinance of marriage was required to reach the highest level of salvation.^[51] Smith also introduced a second anointing ritual, after which a participant was guaranteed virtually unconditional salvation. This has been seen as an attempt to retain the Calvinistic ideas of assured salvation.^[52]

In his later years Smith also differed from traditional Protestantism in his views on the nature of God and humanity. Eventually Smith reduced the difference between God and man to one of degree. Both God and man are coeternal and uncreated. He taught that humans could progress to an exalted state in which they became coequal with a God who was material, plural, and himself a glorified man existing within time.^[53] Smith taught that both God the Father and Jesus were distinct beings with physical bodies, and that the Holy Spirit was a personage of Spirit.^[54] Because God had once been a man who had risen to a high position in heaven,^[55] humans too could progress to godhood. Such a teaching implied a vast hierarchy of gods who would rule kingdoms of inferior intelligences, and so forth in an eternal hierarchy.^[56] Unlike the god of traditional Christianity, the god envisioned by Smith did not create the eternal spirits of humanity—he only organized them and provided them with a plan to follow in his footsteps.^[57] God was God not because he was an ex nihilo creator, but because he had the greatest intelligence.^[58]

After Smith's death, his successor Brigham Young and others built upon Smith's late teachings and introduced more significant doctrinal innovations. The resulting religious tradition defined the Mormonism of the Mormon pioneer era in the 19th century. An important part of this pioneer Mormonism is the Adam–God doctrine, which became the most prominent (but not exclusive) theology of 19th-century Mormonism.^[59] Young taught that God the Father was Adam, a mortal man resurrected and exalted to godhood.^[60] Proponents of this doctrine believed that Father Adam, as the subordinate member of a three-god council, created the earth.^[61] Adam was both the common ancestor and the father of all spirits born on the earth.^[62] After ascending again to his heavenly throne,^[63] Adam returned to physically father Jesus by Mary.^[64]

Some elements of Mormonism from the pioneer era, including polygamy and the Adam–God doctrine, were renounced around the turn of the 20th century by the LDS Church.^[65] However, these elements have been retained within the small branch of Mormonism known as Mormon fundamentalism.

Near the turn of the 20th century there was a movement to codify LDS theology with official statements of Church leaders — which served to quash speculative ideas that persisted as sub rosa concepts among some Mormons. This coincided with an effort to stop new plural marriages — mostly forbidden in 1890 and completely forbidden after 1904. Prominent Mormons such as Joseph F. Smith, John A. Widstoe, and James E. Talmage formulated the outlines of Mormon orthodoxy with publications that significantly narrowed the realm of acceptable speculative Mormon theology.

In traditional Christianity, as expressed in the Athanasian Creed, God is conceived both as a unity and a Trinity: God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit are three hypostases of one uncreated substance— one God, omnipotent, co-equal and co-eternal.^{[citation needed]} Though modern Mormons share with traditional Christianity a belief that the object of their worship comprises three distinct persons, Mormon theology disagrees with the idea that the three persons are the same substance and the same God.^[66]

Mormons are constrained by the language of the Book of Mormon to regard the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as "one", but consider this a social unity rather than ontological. Mormons since the time of Joseph Smith have regarded God as plural.^[67] They regard God the Father as the biblical god Elohim, and they believe that the Son, a distinct being, is both Jesus and the biblical God Jehovah.^[68] The two of them, together with the Holy Spirit, are believed to form a heavenly council which Mormons call the "Godhead". They are "one" in the sense of being lovingly united in purpose or will, a view sometimes called social trinitarianism.^[69] Unlike traditional Christians, modern Mormons generally regard the Son as subordinate to the Father.^[70][71]

Mormons since the 1840s have believed that God is changeable. They believe that the Father (like the Son) was twice "born"—once as a spirit, and again as a mortal man.^[72] After he lived a mortal life, Mormons believe that the Father died, was resurrected, and achieved his godhood^[73] along with at least one wife whom Mormons refer to as the Heavenly Mother.^[74] Some believe that the Heavenly Father and Mother gave birth to the spirits of humanity through a sexual union.^[75] Modern Mormons believe that Jesus, the Son, was the first born of these spirits.^[76]

While Mormons might agree with the statement that the Father and the Son are "uncreated", their understanding of "creation" differs from that of traditional Christianity. Mormons do not believe, as do traditional Christians, that God created the universe ex nihilo (from nothing).^[77] Rather, to Mormons, the act of creation is to organize or reorganize pre-existing matter or intelligence.^[78] Traditional Christians consider God to be a "necessary being", meaning that he cannot not exist, while all other creations are "contingent beings". In Mormonism, by contrast, God created the universe and everything in it from existing matter.^[79]

The Mormon sense of "eternal" differs from that of traditional Christians, who believe that God's eternal nature exists outside of space and time. Very few in the LDS Church situate God outside of space and time.^[80] However, Mormon scripture states that "time is measured only unto man."^[81] They believe that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are co-eternal, and they believe that all of humanity is co-eternal with the Father^[82] in the sense that the underlying spark of all intelligence has always existed (in space and time) and never was created.

Mormons believe that God is scrutable through revelation,^[83][84] and anthropomorphic,^[85] in that he has a physical body of flesh and bone.^[86][87] Mormons believe in traditional Christian notions that God is omnipotent and omniscient, and also believe that "[e]ven God's omnipotence must conform to the attributes of truth and wisdom and justice and mercy".^[88][89]

Although the LDS Church has never officially adopted a doctrine of soteriology,^[90] most Mormons accept the doctrine of salvation formulated by B. H. Roberts, John A. Widstoe and James E. Talmage in the early 20th century.^[91] In contrast to early Mormons, modern Mormons generally reject the idea of original sin.^[92] The Fall of Man is viewed not as a curse but as part of God's Plan of Salvation.^[93][94][95]

Mormons believe they must not only have faith and repent but also be baptized (by immersion and by an authorised priesthood holder within the Church) and bring forth good works.^[96] Mormons consider their weekly Eucharist (the Sacrament) as a means of renewing their baptismal covenant and being repeatedly cleansed from sin. Although the grace of Jesus plays a role in salvation, each Mormon must "work out his own salvation" through Jesus Christ.^[97] Mormons believe that people not baptized during their lifetime may accept salvation in the afterlife through the Mormon practice of baptism for the dead.^[50] Although the Book of Mormon rejected the doctrine of universal reconciliation, Smith taught that damnation was a temporary state (for all but the Sons of Perdition) from which the wicked would ultimately escape after they had paid for their sins, to be resurrected into one of the two lesser kingdoms of glory.^[49]

Mormonism takes an extended view of Christian perfection,^[98] asserting that through the grace of Jesus, Mormons may become perfectly sanctified and thereby literally become gods or achieve a state known as exaltation.^[99] To achieve exaltation, Mormons must remain obedient to the teachings of Jesus, receive all the ordinances (or sacraments), which includes baptism, confirmation, receiving the Melchizedek priesthood (for males), the temple endowment, and being sealed to a spouse.^[51] Smith also introduced a second anointing ritual,^[100] whose participants, upon continued obedience, were sealed to exaltation, but this was not an essential ordinance.^[101]

Like Catholicism and Orthodoxy, Mormonism assigns considerable authoritative status to church tradition and ecclesiastical leadership.^[102] Mormons emphasize the authority of an institutional church, which in all Mormon denominations derives from the Church of Christ established by Joseph Smith in 1830. Mormons believe this church to be the "only true and living church". Below Jesus as the head of the church is a single man chosen as the "Prophet" who holds the position of President of the Church. The Prophet has been compared to the Pope in Catholicism because both, within their respective faiths, are regarded as the leading authority.^{[citation needed]}

Mormons also believe in apostolic succession. However, Mormons believe the Catholic line of succession is invalid because of a Great Apostasy that occurred soon after era of the apostles. The line of succession was restored through Joseph Smith when biblical prophets and apostles appeared to him and ordained him through the laying on of hands with lost priesthood authority. Thus, Mormons believe that non-Mormon clergy have no heavenly authority and that sacraments performed by clergy of other faiths are of no effect in the eyes of God.^[103] Mormons reject the Protestant doctrine of the "priesthood of all believers", but they consider all confirmed Mormons to have the "Gift of the Holy Ghost" (also conveyed by the laying on of hands), which entitles believers to spiritual gifts but to no ecclesiastical authority.

Some claim that in the late-20th century, a conservative movement within the LDS Church (called "Mormon neo-orthodoxy" on the analogy of an earlier Protestant neo-orthodoxy)^[104] emphasized the Book of Mormon over later revelations^[105] and embraced original sin, an absolute, eternal, and unchanging God, a pessimistic assessment of human nature, and a doctrine of salvation by grace rather than by works.^[106]

Despite the book's importance to early Mormonism, early Mormons rarely quoted from the Book of Mormon in their speeches and writings.^[107] Joseph Smith's later teachings and writings focused on the Bible, including his own revision and commentary of the Authorized King James Version. The book was not regularly cited in Mormon conferences until the 1980s.^[107] Within the LDS Church, a movement to re-emphasize the Jesus-based elements of Mormonism in the 1980s included a rediscovery of the Book of Mormon.^[108] In 1982, the church subtitled the book "Another Testament of Jesus Christ", to emphasize that Jesus was a central focus of the book^[109] and that the book is intended to be a complement to the Bible.

Although Mormon neo-orthodox scholars say they have faced "resistance" from Mormon orthodoxy,^[110] some perceive the direction of the movement to be consistent with a broader trend among the LDS hierarchy to present Mormonism in terms more acceptable to mainline Christianity.^[111] Critics argue that because Mormonism is not based on an authoritative systematic theology,^[112] and much of Mormon scripture was written when Mormonism was "essentially trinitarian", Mormon leaders and apologists have been able to deny that at least some of 20th-century orthodox Mormonism represents official Mormon doctrine.^[113] It is also claimed that LDS Church publications and a few Mormon scholars have increasingly used the language of Nicene Christianity to describe the nature of God.^[114]

The existence and implications of the movement continues to be debated. Theologian Richard Mouw asserts that Mormons have downplayed some of its more "heretical" doctrines in order to obtain more effective dialogue with other Christians.^[115] Terryl Givens, a Mormon theologian, has rejected such claims, asserting instead that many Mormon "heresies" eventually become more accepted by much of Christianity. He consequently contends that "Christian consensus is fluid and, in some cases, has lagged behind the Mormon model."^[116]

In the past, most mainstream Christian denominations rejected Mormonism outright, frequently calling it a cult and characterizing it as "non-Christian".^[117] According to Jan Shipps, during the 1950s the attitude of mainstream Christians towards Mormonism changed from "vilification" to "veneration", with emphasis on positive Mormon traits such as "family orientation, clean-cut optimism, honesty and pleasant aggressiveness".^[118]

Richard Abanes attributes an "increasing lack of delineation between (Mormonism and mainstream Christianity)" to three primary causes:

1. the willingness of some Mormon leaders to be less than candid about more controversial aspects of LDS history and theology,
2. a trend among some Mormon scholars to make LDS belief sound more mainstream, and
3. an evolution of Mormon thought toward doctrinal positions nearer those of evangelicals.^[119]

Richard Bushman asserts that, for many people, Mormonism "conjures up an assortment of contradictory images". One set of images suggests that Mormons are "happy, uncomplicated, kindly and innocent—if perhaps naive". In contrast to this set of images, Bushman describes a set of associations that focuses on "a powerful religious hierarchy controlling the church from the top". This perspective views Mormons as "secretive, clannish and perhaps dangerous", often labeling the movement as a "cult rather than a church".^[120]

Mormon apologist Stephen E. Robinson argued that Mormons are labeled heretics "for opinions and practices that are freely tolerated in other mainstream denominations".^[121]

Mormonism has a particularly rocky relationship with American evangelical Christianity and the Catholic Church.^[122] The Catholic Church declared Mormonism to be "non-Christian". Richard Mouw, President of Fuller Theological Seminary, an evangelical school in Pasadena, California, stated in a recent opinion piece for CNN, "[t]hose of us who have made the effort to engage Mormons in friendly and sustained give-and-take conversations have come to see them as good citizens whose life of faith often exhibits qualities that are worthy of the Christian label, even as we continue to engage in friendly arguments with them about crucial theological issues."^[123] William Saletan has been more blunt about this, stating "[w]hy don't we challenge anti-Mormonism? Because it's the prejudice of our age."^[124] Joe Scarborough has drawn analogies between the Pharisees in the New Testament and prominent evangelical religious leader Robert Jeffress calling Mormonism a cult.^[125]

Latter Day Saint history comes from the position that other churches were the product of the apostasy, as referenced in the Bible.^[126] Mormons view other Christian churches as teaching some truth, doing good works, and acknowledge their strong faith in Christ.^[127] However, Mormons also maintain that all other churches lack the divine authority to perform the ordinances of the gospel because of the Great Apostasy. The LDS Church and most other Latter Day Saint factions do not accept the baptisms of other Christian denominations as valid.

The Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant branches of Christianity reject Mormon claims of additional scriptures, and of the prophetic office of Joseph Smith and other Mormon leaders; they disagree with Mormon charges that they have committed apostasy. Doctrines such as the beliefs about the existence of prophets in early American civilizations, which are unique to Mormon theology and not found in the teachings of other Christian churches are also causes of disagreement. Nonetheless, many Christian denominations treat Mormons with respect, while not minimizing the differences in belief.^[128]

In 2001, the Vatican's Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith declared that LDS baptisms are invalid, and therefore null.^[129] Because of differences in Mormon and Catholic beliefs concerning the Trinity, the Catholic Church stated that Mormon baptism was not the baptism that Christ instituted.^[130] In comparison, the Catholic Church does not require rebaptism for converts to Catholicism from most Protestant or Orthodox churches.^[131] The Catholic Bishop of Salt Lake City, George Hugh Niederauer, stated that this ruling "should not be understood as either judging or measuring a spiritual relationship between Jesus Christ and the LDS Church".^[132]

The Presbyterian Church USA, the largest Presbyterian body in the United States, publishes a brochure describing the LDS Church as follows:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, like the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), declares allegiance to Jesus. Latter-day Saints and Presbyterians share use of the Bible as scripture, and members of both churches use common theological terms. Nevertheless, Mormonism is a new and emerging religious tradition distinct from the historic apostolic tradition of the Christian Church, of which Presbyterians are a part. ... It is the practice of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) to receive on profession of faith those coming directly from a Mormon background and to administer baptism. ... Presbyterian relationships with Latter-day Saints have changed throughout the twentieth century. By God's grace they may change further.^[133]

The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, the largest Lutheran body in the US, notes that Lutherans have been among those Christians who do not re-baptize other baptized Christians; however, it publishes the following statement on the recognition of Mormon baptisms:

Although Mormons may use water—and lots of it—and while they may say "Father, Son, and Holy Spirit", their teaching about the nature of God is substantially different from that of orthodox, creedal Christianity. Because the Mormon understanding of the Word of God is not the same as the Christian understanding, it is correct to say that Christian Baptism has not taken place.^[134]

In its 2000 General Conference, the United Methodist Church decided not to recognize Latter-day Saint baptisms, stating:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, by self-definition, does not fit within the bounds of the historic, apostolic tradition of Christian faith. This conclusion is supported by the fact that the LDS Church itself, while calling itself Christian, explicitly professes a distinction and separateness from the ecumenical community and is intentional about clarifying significant differences in doctrine. As United Methodists we agree with their assessment that the LDS Church is not a part of the historic, apostolic tradition of the Christian faith.^{[135][better source needed]}

The Episcopal Church (USA), part of the 80-million-member Anglican Communion, does not have an official position on the validity of Mormon baptism; however, most traditional clergy would not accept Mormon baptism and require the baptism of Mormons entering into the Episcopal Church. Retired bishop Carolyn Tanner Irish of the Episcopal Diocese of Utah was baptized into the LDS Church at the age of 8; her baptism was deemed valid upon her entering into the Episcopal Church in 1977, where she was confirmed by bishop of Washington, Rev. John T. Walker.^[136] As with the United Methodist Church, the Episcopal Church does not recognize Mormons as historic Apostolic Christians, but rather as a new and unique religious movement that is an offshoot of Christianity.^[137]

Many other Christian churches also seek to teach or convert Mormons when the opportunity arises. Some evangelical Christian leaders often encourage their followers to follow the admonition of Paul ^[138] and witness to others using gentleness and respect. Like their Mormon counterparts, those from the evangelical Christian religions assert that these proselytizing efforts arise out of love and genuine concern for others and not a desire to cause contention. Consequently, though the feelings may be strong, there is often a feeling of mutual appreciation and respect that accompanies missionary efforts on both sides (though this is not always the case). Some evangelical Christian denominations have ministries focused on Mormons, just as they also have ministries toward Jews, Native Americans, or other demographic groups.^{[139][140][141]} For example, the 1998 convention of the Southern Baptist Convention held in Salt Lake City had the stated aim to "bring Christianity to the Mormons".

There are also many independent evangelical ministries and organizations focused on Mormons.^[142]

A 2016 Pew Poll showed that only 51% of the general public in the United States believed that Mormons were Christians while another 32% said they were not, which was in stark contrast with the 97% of Mormons who considered themselves Christians.^[143] Additionally, when asked to describe in one word to best represent Mormonism, Mormons typically replied "Christian", "Christ-Centered" or "Jesus", while most non-Mormons replied with "Cult".^[143]

Similar polls have concluded that over two-thirds of the general public view Mormons as members of the larger Christian community, including many independent evangelical ministries and prominent evangelical leaders.^{[citation needed]} However, in an October 2010 poll conducted by LifeWay Research, three out of four American Protestant pastors did not believe that Mormons were Christians.^[144]

In the 1960s, the LDS Church formed the Church Information Service with the goal of being ready to respond to media inquiries and generate positive media coverage. The organization kept a photo file to provide photos to the media for such events as temple dedications. It also would work to get stories covering Family Home Evening, the church's welfare plan and the church's youth activities in various publications.^[145]

As part of the church's efforts to re-position its image, the church began to moderate its earlier anti-Catholic rhetoric. In Bruce R. McConkie's 1958 edition of Mormon Doctrine, he had stated his opinion that the Catholic Church was part of "the church of the devil" and "the great and abominable church" because it was among organizations that misled people away from following God's laws. In his 1966 edition of the same book, the specific reference to the Catholic Church was removed.^[146]

In 1973, the LDS Church recast its missionary lessons, making them more family-friendly and focused on building on common Christian ideals. The new lessons, named "A Uniform System for Teaching Families", de-emphasized the Great Apostasy, which previously held a prominent position just after the story of the First Vision. After a further revision in the early 1980s, the lessons dealt with the apostasy even less conspicuously by moving its discussion from the first lesson to later lessons. The lessons also became more family-friendly, including a flip chart with pictures, in part to encourage the participation of children.^{[citation needed]}

In 1995, the church announced a new logo design that emphasized the words "JESUS CHRIST" in large capital letters. According to Bruce L. Olsen, director of public affairs for the church, "The logo re-emphasizes the official name of the church and the central position of the Savior in its theology. It stresses our allegiance to the Lord, Jesus Christ."^[147]

In 2001, the church sent out a press release encouraging reporters to use the full name of the church at the beginning of news articles, with following references to the "Church of Jesus Christ". The release discouraged the use of the term "Mormon Church".^[148]

Riess and Tickle assert that, starting in the late twentieth century, Mormons have focused their attention on Jesus Christ more than at any other time since the inception of their faith. Some critics of the LDS Church have accused church leaders of attempting to disingenuously portray the church as "just another Christian denomination" when, in fact, there are significant differences. Riess and Tickle argue that these critics are failing to grasp that this recent emphasis on Jesus Christ is part of a genuine theological evolution that concurrently involves a renewed interest in the Book of Mormon.^[147]

Ross Anderson asserts that, "(i)n public, LDS spokesmen downplay their Church's distinctive doctrines."^{[149][page needed]}

Patricia Limerick suggests that future historians may conclude that, in the last four decades of the 20th, the general authorities of the LDS Church "undertook to standardize Mormon thought and practice". According to Limerick, this campaign of standardization has led to a retreat from the distinctive elements of Mormonism and an accentuation of the church's similarity to conventional Christianity.^[150]

According to Claudia Bushman, "[t]he renewed emphasis on scripture study, especially the Book of Mormon, led the Church away from speculative theology. The freewheeling General Conference addresses of earlier years, elaborating unique LDS doctrines, were gradually replaced with a basic Christian message downplaying denominational differences."^[151]

Recent church presidents have tended to downplay those doctrines that served to distinguish Mormonism from mainline churches.^[152] Richard Abanes asserts that President Gordon B. Hinckley "on numerous occasions demonstrated his willingness to seriously downplay any issues that might be construed as controversial".^[153]

In 2001, Hinckley stated that message of the LDS Church was "Christ-centered. [Christ is] our leader. He's our head. His name is the name of our church."^[154]

When speaking about other faiths, modern LDS leaders have adopted a policy of avoiding the use of critical and judgmental language in official church publications, and encouraged members of the church to be respectful of the beliefs of others as they witness in their personal lives.^[155] When speaking about other faiths, church magazines are often complimentary and focus on providing factual information rather than on sensationalizing or otherwise seeking to undermine the creeds and practices of others.^[156]

Several presidents of the LDS Church over the years have emphasized the need for Mormons to recognize the good contributions those of other faiths make to the world.^[157]

Ron Rhodes asserts that, "The Mormon church has in recent years sought to downplay its exclusivism as the 'restored' church. Indeed, the Mormon church has increasingly become involved with the Interfaith movement, joining with various Christian denominations in various charities."^[158]

Traditional Christian denominations and the LDS Church share work in providing welfare or humanitarian aid. In recent years, the LDS Church has opened its broadcasting facilities (Bonneville International) to other Christian groups, and has participated in the VISN Religious Interfaith Cable Television Network.

There have been independent activities among individuals from both traditions who attempt to discuss openly about issues of faith.^[159] In November 2004, Fuller Theological Seminary President Richard Mouw and Ravi Zacharias, a well known evangelical Christian philosophical apologist, addressed a congregation of Mormons and evangelicals gathered in the Salt Lake Tabernacle for an event sponsored by Standing Together Ministries that was well received despite the differences they acknowledged between Mormonism and evangelical perspectives.^[160]

In the 1950s, President David O. McKay met with Bishop Duane G. Hunt, of the Diocese of Salt Lake City, several times in secret, at Holy Cross Hospital in Salt Lake City, to avoid fears of scandalizing members of their respective churches. Their meetings consisted of discussions about community issues and tensions between the two groups in Utah.^[161]

In 2019, while in Rome to dedicate the Rome Italy Temple, President Russell M. Nelson met with Pope Francis. Nelson is the first Latter-day Saint prophet to meet with a Catholic pope. Nelson said that he and Francis spoke about the "importance of religious liberty, the importance of the family, our mutual concern for the youth of the church, for the secularization of the world, and the need for people to come to God, and worship him, pray to him and have the stability that faith in Jesus Christ will bring in their lives."^[162]

Mormons proselytize to all people, including members of other Christian churches, holding to the belief that God told Joseph Smith "that those professors [of religion] were all corrupt; that: 'they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof.'"^[163] Because ministering to those of other Christian faiths can be a sensitive task when feelings on both sides are strong, leaders of the LDS Church have counseled members to be sensitive, to exercise caution, and to avoid contentions in their preaching. Despite the criticisms of other creeds, a tone of respect has consistently been encouraged by Mormon leaders. For example, Wilford Woodruff, an early president of the church and a contemporary of Joseph Smith taught:

When you go into a neighborhood to preach the Gospel, never attempt to tear down a man's house, so to speak, before you build him a better one; never, in fact, attack any one's religion, wherever you go. Be willing to let every man enjoy his own religion. It is his right to do that. If he does not accept your testimony with regard to the Gospel of Christ, that is his affair, and not yours. Do not spend your time in pulling down other sects and parties. We haven't time to do that. It is never right to do that.^[164]

While the LDS Church has been clear about its disagreements with many of the theologies and practices of other religions and seeks actively to convert all people to its own teachings, it has also always adopted a policy of toleration for others and defended the rights of all people to worship God freely. Article 11 of the church's Articles of Faith written by Joseph Smith states, "We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may."^[165] Smith spoke often of the need for Mormons to be civil and courteous in their treatment of others, particularly those who were not of their faith, and to be willing to defend the right of anyone to religious freedom. He said:

If we would secure and cultivate the love of others, we must love others, even our enemies as well as friends ... I possess the principle of love. All I can offer the world is a good heart and a good hand. The Saints can testify whether I am willing to lay down my life for my brethren. If it has been demonstrated that I have been willing to die for a "Mormon", I am bold to declare before Heaven that I am just as ready to die in defending the rights of a Presbyterian, a Baptist, or a good man of any other denomination. ... It is a love of liberty which inspires my soul.^[166]

Because Mormon missionaries proselytize to all, including other Christians, some Christian organizations have published tracts, brochures and books designed to counter these missionary efforts.^{[167][168][169]}

Conciliar Press, a department of the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America, has published a brochure designed to inform Orthodox Christians of the proselytizing efforts of what it describes as "cultists" (Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses).

In 2006, the Catholic bishops in Slovakia urged all Catholics in the country not to sign a petition allowing the LDS Church to be legally recognized in that country.^[170]

• Christian countercult movement
• Criticism of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
• Judaism and Mormonism
• Mormon apologetics
• Mormonism and Freemasonry
• Mormonism and Islam
• Moroni (Book of Mormon prophet)
• Catholic-Protestant relations

• Abanes, Richard (2007). Inside Today's Mormonism. Harvest House Publishers. ISBN 978-0-7369-1968-5.
• Alexander, Thomas G. (1980). "The Reconstruction of Mormon Doctrine: From Joseph Smith to Progressive Theology" (PDF). Sunstone. Vol. 5, no. 4. pp. 24–33.
• Bergera, Gary James (1980). "The Orson Pratt-Brigham Young Controversies: Conflict Within the Quorums, 1853 to 1868". Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought. 13 (2): 7–49. doi:10.2307/45224861. JSTOR 45224861. S2CID 254314595. Archived from the original on 2011-06-14.
• Craig L. Blomberg & Stephen E. Robinson; How Wide the Divide?: A Mormon & an Evangelical in Conversation; Inter-Varsity Press; ISBN 0-8308-1991-6; (Softcover April 1997)
• Bloom, Harold (1992). The American Religion: The Emergence of the Post-Christian Nation (1st ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-671-67997-2.
• Brodie, Fawn M. (1971). No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith (2nd ed.). New York: Knopf. ISBN 0-394-46967-4.
• Brooke, John L. (1994). The Refiner's Fire: The Making of Mormon Cosmology, 1644–1844. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Buerger, David John (1983). "The Fulness of the Priesthood": The Second Anointing in Latter-day Saint Theology and Practice". Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought. 16 (1). doi:10.2307/45225125. JSTOR 45225125. Archived from the original on 2011-08-08.
• Bushman, Richard Lyman (2008). Mormonism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-531030-6.
• Bushman, Richard Lyman (2005). Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling. New York: Knopf. ISBN 1-4000-4270-4.
• Charles, Melodie Moench (1993). "Book of Mormon Christology". In Metcalfe, Brent Lee (ed.). New Approaches to the Book of Mormon. Salt Lake City: Signature Books. pp. 81–114.
• Davies, Douglas J. (2003). An Introduction to Mormonism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-81738-7. OCLC 438764483. S2CID 146238056.
• DePillis, Mario S. (1966). "The Quest for Religious Authority and the Rise of Mormonism" (PDF). Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought. 1 (1): 70.
• Duffy, John-Charles (2004). "Defending the Kingdom, Rethinking the Faith: How Apologetics is Reshaping Mormon Orthodoxy" (PDF). Sunstone. Vol. 132, no. May. pp. 22–55.
• Eliason, Eric Alden (2001). Mormons and Mormonism: an introduction to an American world religion. University of Illinois Press.
• Ford, Clyde D. (2005). "Lehi on the Great Issues: Book of Mormon Theology in Early Nineteenth-Century Perspective" (PDF). Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought. 38 (4): 75–96. doi:10.2307/45227341. JSTOR 45227341. S2CID 254301981.
• Gordon, Sarah Barringer (2002). The Mormon question: polygamy and constitutional conflict in nineteenth century America. UNC Press Books. p. 11.
• Hill, Marvin S. (1969). "The Shaping of the Mormon Mind in New England and New York" (PDF). BYU Studies. 9 (3): 363–65.^{[permanent dead link]}
• Hill, Marvin S. (1989). Quest for Refuge: The Mormon Flight from American Pluralism. Salt Lake City, Utah: Signature Books. Archived from the original on 2010-01-16.
• Hullinger, Robert N. (1992). Joseph Smith's Response to Skepticism. Salt Lake City, Utah: Signature Books. Archived from the original on 2010-07-07. Retrieved 2010-12-09.
• Kirkland, Boyd (1984). "Jehovah as the Father: The Development of the Mormon Jehovah Doctrine" (PDF). Sunstone. Vol. 44, no. Autumn. pp. 36–44.
• Kirkland, Boyd (1986). "Elohim and Jehovah in Mormonism and the Bible". Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought. 19 (1): 77–93. doi:10.2307/45225454. JSTOR 45225454. S2CID 254341289. Archived from the original on 2011-06-13.
• Larson, Stan (1978). "The King Follett Discourse: A Newly Amalgamated Text". BYU Studies. 18 (2): 193–208. Archived from the original on 2010-08-26.
• Lindgren, A. Bruce (1986). "Sign or Scripture: Approaches to the Book of Mormon". Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought. 19 (1): 69. doi:10.2307/45225452. JSTOR 45225452. S2CID 254330519. Archived from the original on 2012-12-11.
• Ludlow, Daniel H., ed. (1992). Encyclopedia of Mormonism. New York: Macmillan. ISBN 0-02-904040-X.
• Martin Marty; Mormonism in Dialogue with Contemporary Christian Theologies; Mercer University Press; ISBN 978-0-88146-116-9;(Softcover December 2007).
• Matzko, John (2007). "The Encounter of the Young Joseph Smith with Presbyterianism" (PDF). Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought. 40 (3): 68–84. doi:10.5406/dialjmormthou.40.3.0068. S2CID 246616088.
• Mauss, Armand (1994). The Angel and the Beehive: The Mormon Struggle with Assimilation. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. ISBN 0-252-02071-5.
• McMurrin, Sterling M. (1965). The Theological Foundations of the Mormon Religion. Salt Lake City: Signature Books. ISBN 1-56085-135-X.
• Robert L. Millet & Gerald R. McDermott; Claiming Christ: A Mormon–Evangelical Debate; Brazos Press; ISBN 978-1-58743-209-5; (Softcover November 1, 2007)
• Robert L. Millet & Gregory C. V. Johnson; Bridging the Divide: The Continuing Conversation between a Mormon and an Evangelical; Monkfish Book Publishing; ISBN 978-0-9766843-6-7; (Softcover November 13, 2007)
• Ostler, Blake T. (1991). "Development of the Mormon Concept of Grace" (PDF). Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought. 24 (1): 57–84. doi:10.2307/45227723. JSTOR 45227723. S2CID 254303352.
• Ostling, Richard; Ostling, Joan K. (2007). Mormon America: The Power and the Promise. New York: HarperOne. ISBN 978-0-06-143295-8.
• Pottenger, John R. (2007). Reaping the whirlwind: liberal democracy and the religious axis. Georgetown University Press. p. 143.
• Prince, Gregory A (1995). Power From On High: The Development of Mormon Priesthood. Salt Lake City: Signature Books. ISBN 1-56085-071-X.
• Reynolds, Noel B. (2005). "The Case for Sidney Rigdon as the Author of the Lectures on Faith". Journal of Mormon History. 32 (3): 1–41.
• Quinn, D. Michael (1994). The Mormon Hierarchy: Origins of Power. Salt Lake City: Signature Books. ISBN 1-56085-056-6.
• Riess, Jana; Tickle, Phyllis (2005). The book of Mormon: selections annotated & explained. SkyLight Paths Publishing.
• Roberts, B. H., ed. (1909). History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Vol. 5. Salt Lake City: Deseret News. ISBN 0-87747-688-8.
• Sheperd, Gordon; Sheperd, Gary (September 1984). "Mormonism in Secular Society: Changing Patterns in Official Ecclesiastical Rhetoric". Review of Religious Research. 26 (1): 28–42. doi:10.2307/3511040. JSTOR 3511040.
• Shipps, Jan (1985). Mormonism: The Story of a New Religious Tradition. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. ISBN 0-252-01417-0.
• Shipps, Jan (1993). "'Is Mormonism Christian?' Reflections on a Complicated Question". BYU Studies. 33 (3). Archived from the original on 2011-11-07. Retrieved 2011-01-09.
• Shipps, Jan (2000). Sojourner in the promised land: forty years among the Mormons. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. ISBN 0-252-02590-3.
• Smith, Stephen L. (1980). "The Book of Mormon in a Biblical Culture". Journal of Mormon History. 7: 3–21.^{[permanent dead link]}
• Stark, Rodney; Neilson, Reid Larkin (2005). The rise of Mormonism. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-13634-1.
• Toscano, Margaret; Toscano, Paul (1990). Strangers in Paradox: Explorations in Mormon Theology. Salt Lake City: Signature Books.
• Turner, John G. (2016). The Mormon Jesus: A Biography. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-73743-3.
• Vogel, Dan (1993). "Anti-Universal Rhetoric in the Book of Mormon". In Metcalfe, Brent Lee (ed.). New Approaches to the Book of Mormon. Salt Lake City: Signature Books. pp. 21–52.
• White, O. Kendall Jr. (1970). "The Transformation of Mormon Theology" (PDF). Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought. 5 (2): 9–24. doi:10.2307/45224197. JSTOR 45224197. S2CID 254388331.
• White, O. Kendall Jr. (1987). Mormon Neo-Orthodoxy: A Crisis Theology. Salt Lake City: Signature Books. ISBN 0-941214-52-4. Archived from the original on 2010-07-07. Retrieved 2010-12-28.
• Widmer, Kurt (2000). Mormonism and the Nature of God: A Theological Evolution, 1830–1915. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland.
• Stephen E. Robinson (1991). Are Mormons Christians?. Bookcraft, Inc. ISBN 0-88494-784-X.

• Beckwith, Francis J.; Carl Mosser; Paul Owen, eds. (2002). The New Mormon Challenge: Responding to the Latest Defenses of a Fast-Growing Movement. Zondervan. ISBN 0-310-23194-9.
• Bloomberg, Craig (1997). How Wide the Divide? A Mormon & an Evangelical in Conversation. IVP Academic. ISBN 0-8308-1991-6.
• Gellinek, Christian; Hans-Wilhelm Kelling (2001). Avenues to Christianity: Mormonism in Comparative Church History. Studies of the Latter-Day Saint Religion. Global Publications, Binghamton University. ISBN 1-58684-128-9.
• Hopkins, Richard R. (1994). Biblical Mormonism: Responding to Evangelical Criticism of L.D.S. Theology. Harvest Publishers. ISBN 0-88290-482-5.
• Shuster, Eric (2009). Catholic roots, Mormon Harvest. Cedar Fort, Inc. ISBN 978-1-59955-257-6.
• Robinson, Stephen (1998). Are Mormons Christians?. Bookcraft. ISBN 1-57008-409-2.
• "Are Mormons Christian?". lds.org. LDS Church.
• Ricks, Stephen (1992). "Creation, Creation Accounts". Encyclopedia of Mormonism.

• ComeUntoChrist.org official informational website of the LDS Church.
• "Is Mormonism Christian?" A debate between Bruce D. Porter and Gerald R. McDermott, First Things, October 2008
• Utah Lighthouse Ministry - Protestant Christian website that defends their view of the Bible.
• "We Have Sinned Against You" - A leading evangelical speaks at the Salt Lake Tabernacle and says evangelicals have spread lies about LDS beliefs.
• "The Mormons" - Frontline + American Experience four-hour PBS documentary aired April 30 – May 1, 2007
• Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Mormons" . Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.