List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 48

This is a list of cases reported in volume 48 (7 How.) of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1848 and 1849.[1]

Supreme Court of the United States
Map
38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789; 235 years ago (1789-03-04)
LocationWashington, D.C.
Coordinates38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized byConstitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthLife tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Websitesupremecourt.gov

Nominative reports

In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called "nominative reports").

Benjamin Chew Howard

Starting with the 42nd volume of U.S. Reports, the Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States was Benjamin Chew Howard. Howard was Reporter of Decisions from 1843 to 1860, covering volumes 42 through 65 of United States Reports which correspond to volumes 1 through 24 of his Howard's Reports. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, United States v. City of Chicago is 48 U.S. (7 How.) 185 (1849).

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 48 U.S. (7 How.)

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[2] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in 48 U.S. (7 How.) were decided the Court comprised these nine members:

PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
Roger B. TaneyChief JusticeMarylandJohn MarshallMarch 15, 1836
(29–15)
March 28, 1836

October 12, 1864
(Died)
John McLeanAssociate JusticeOhioRobert TrimbleMarch 7, 1829
(Acclamation)
January 11, 1830

April 4, 1861
(Died)
James Moore WayneAssociate JusticeGeorgiaWilliam JohnsonJanuary 9, 1835
(Acclamation)
January 14, 1835

July 5, 1867
(Died)
John CatronAssociate JusticeTennesseenewly-created seatMarch 8, 1837
(28–15)
May 1, 1837

May 30, 1865
(Died)
John McKinleyAssociate JusticeAlabamanewly-created seatSeptember 25, 1837
(Acclamation)
January 9, 1838

July 19, 1852
(Died)
Peter Vivian DanielAssociate JusticeVirginiaPhilip P. BarbourMarch 2, 1841
(25–5)
January 10, 1842

May 31, 1860
(Died)
Samuel NelsonAssociate JusticeNew YorkSmith ThompsonFebruary 14, 1845
(Acclamation)
February 27, 1845

November 28, 1872
(Retired)
Levi WoodburyAssociate JusticeNew HampshireJoseph StoryJanuary 31, 1846
(Acclamation)
September 23, 1845

September 4, 1851
(Died)
Robert Cooper GrierAssociate JusticePennsylvaniaHenry BaldwinAugust 4, 1846
(Acclamation)
August 10, 1846

January 31, 1870
(Retired)

Notable cases in 48 U.S. (7 How.)

Polemic supporting Dorrite cause

Luther v. Borden

In Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. (7 How.) 1 (1849), the Supreme Court established the political question doctrine in controversies arising under the Guarantee Clause of Article Four of the United States Constitution (Art. IV, § 4). The holding that the "republican form of government" clause of Article Four is non-justiciable still stands today. The case arose from the Dorr Rebellion in Rhode Island.

Passenger Cases

Smith v. Turner, and Norris v. Boston, 48 U.S. (7 How.) 283 (1849), are two similar cases, argued together before the Supreme Court, which decided 5-4 that states do not have the right to impose a tax determined by the number of passengers of a designated category on board a ship and/or disembarking into the State. Together, the cases are sometimes termed the Passenger Cases. The Court did not produce a majority opinion. Eight Justices authored separate opinions, totalling hundreds of pages, and their respective stances on various issues did not always align with other justices in their concurrences or dissents. The Passengers Cases are of historical interest. They portray diverse views on several constitutional questions, especially whether the Commerce Clause prohibits any state regulation of interstate and foreign commerce in the absence of federal law or treaty. The failure of the Court to produce a majority opinion significantly diminished the value of the Passengers Cases as a precedent.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in 48 U.S. (7 How.)

Case NamePage & yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinion(s)Dissenting opinion(s)Lower CourtDisposition
Luther v. Borden1 (1849)TaneynoneWoodburyC.C.D.R.I.affirmed
Wilkes v. Dinsman89 (1849)WoodburynonenoneC.C.D.C.reversed
Patton v. Taylor132 (1849)NelsonnonenoneC.C.D. Ky.reversed
Fourniquet v. Perkins160 (1849)DanielnonenoneC.C.D. La.affirmed
Erwin v. Lowry172 (1849)CatronnonenoneLa.reversed
United States v. City of Chicago185 (1849)WoodburynoneCatronC.C.D. Ill.certification
Smith v. Kernochen198 (1849)NelsonnonenoneC.C.S.D. Ala.reversed
McLaughlin v. Bank of Potomac220 (1849)WoodburynonenoneC.C.D.C.affirmed
Wagner v. Baird234 (1849)GriernonenoneC.C.D. Ohioaffirmed
Matheson v. Bank of Ala.260 (1849)TaneynonenoneAla.dismissed
McArthur's Heirs v. Dun's Heirs262 (1849)DanielnonenoneC.C.D. Ohiocertification
Mace v. Wells272 (1848)McLeannonenoneVt.reversed
Bodley v. Goodrich276 (1849)McLeannonenoneC.C.D. La.affirmed
Crawford v. Bank of Ala.279 (1849)McLeannonenoneAla.dismissed
Passenger Cases283 (1849)noneallallmultiplereversed
Tyler v. Hand573 (1849)WaynenonenoneN.D. Miss.reversed
Kennedy's Ex'rs v. Hunt's Lessee586 (1848)CatronnonenoneAla.dismissed
Hugg v. Augusta Ins. & Banking Co.595 (1849)NelsonnonenoneC.C.D. Md.certification
Peck v. Jenness612 (1849)GriernonenoneN.H.affirmed
Colby v. Ledden626 (1849)GriernonenoneN.H.affirmed
Shawhan v. Wherritt627 (1849)GriernonenoneC.C.D. Ky.affirmed
Sadler v. Hoover646 (1849)TaneynonenoneC.C.S.D. Miss.certification
Barnard v. Gibson650 (1849)McLeannonenoneC.C.N.D.N.Y.dismissed
United States v. Boisdore's Heirs658 (1849)McLeannonenoneS.D. Miss.dismissal denied
Missouri v. Iowa660 (1849)Catronnonenoneoriginalboundary set
Jones v. United States681 (1849)DanielnonenoneC.C.E.D. Va.affirmed
Harris v. Wall693 (1849)GriernonenoneC.C.S.D. Miss.reversed
Townsend v. Jemison706 (1849)WoodburyTaneyDanielN.D. Miss.affirmed
Hardeman v. Harris726 (1849)TaneynonenoneC.C.S.D. Miss.certification
Cutler v. Rae729 (1849)TaneyWaynenoneC.C.D. Mass.reversed
Smith v. Hunter738 (1849)DanielnonenoneOhiodismissed
McDonald v. Hobson745 (1849)NelsonnonenoneC.C.D. Ohioreversed
Massingill v. Downs760 (1849)McLeannonenoneC.C.S.D. Miss.certification
Udell v. Davidson769 (1849)TaneynonenoneIll.dismissed
Neilson v. Lagow772 (1849)TaneynonenoneInd.dismissal denied
Lewis ex rel. Longworth v. Lewis776 (1849)TaneynoneMcLeanC.C.D. Ill.certification
van Rensselaer v. Watt's Ex'rs784 (1849)Taneynonenonenot indicateddocketing denied
Lawrence v. Allen785 (1849)WoodburynonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Backus v. Gould798 (1849)McLeannonenoneC.C.N.D.N.Y.reversed
Nesmith v. Sheldon812 (1849)TaneynonenoneC.C.D. Mich.certification
Stearns v. Page819 (1849)GriernonenoneC.C.D. Me.affirmed
United States v. King833 (1849)TaneynoneMcLean, WayneC.C.E.D. La.reversed

Notes and references

See also